Use of cookies by
Norton Rose Fulbright
We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details and instructions on how to disable those cookies are set out at By continuing to use this website you agree to our use of our cookies unless you have disabled them.
Regulation of Shareholder Democracy Issues | Canada | Norton Rose Fulbright

Regulation of Shareholder Democracy Issues

20 janvier 2011


Services connexes

Pour l'instant, cette publication n'est disponible qu'en anglais

On January 10, 2011, the Ontario Securities Commission published OSC Staff Notice 54-701 - Regulatory Developments Regarding Shareholder Democracy Issues which confirms their continued review of protections for shareholders' rights and corporate governance and provides an update regarding the status of OSC staff's work in the area.  The Notice states that staff is considering the potential development of regulatory proposals regarding the following topics:

  • Slate voting and majority voting for uncontested director elections:  Currently directors may be elected by shareholders voting for a slate of directors or by shareholders voting for each proposed director.  While institutional investors have recommended withholding voting for slates of directors, securities legislation does not currently address this issue.  The OSC is also reviewing whether individual proposed directors should be required to obtain a majority of shareholder votes in order to be elected.
  • Shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation (say-on-pay):  While the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance recommends an annual non-binding advisory vote by shareholders on compensation policies and procedures, the OSC is reviewing whether it is appropriate to require such a shareholders' vote.
  • The effectiveness of the proxy voting system:  The OSC is reviewing what regulations, if any, need to be implemented to ensure an effective proxy voting system that allows shareholders to make informed decisions and effectively exercise their voting rights at shareholders' meetings.

Further issues may arise as a result of their continuing review.  The OSC is soliciting public comments on whether regulation of these issues is desirable and what the scope of such regulation should be.  Comments must be received by the OSC by March 31, 2011.

Le présent document est un instrument d’information et de vulgarisation. Son contenu ne saurait en aucune façon être interprété comme un exposé complet du droit ni comme un avis juridique de Norton Rose OR S.E.N.C.R.L., s.r.l. sur les points de droit qui y sont discutés.

Aucune personne qui est un membre, un associé, un actionnaire, un administrateur, un employé ou un consultant de toute partie constituant le Groupe Norton Rose (que cette personne soit décrite ou non comme un « associé ») n’accepte ni n’assume de responsabilité ni n’a d’obligation envers qui que ce soit relativement à cette publication. Tout renvoi à un associé désigne, selon le cas, un membre de Norton Rose LLP ou de Norton Rose Australia ou de Norton Rose OR S.E.N.C.R.L., s.r.l. ou de Norton Rose South Africa (constitué sous le nom de Deneys Reitz Inc.), ou un consultant ou un employé de Norton Rose LLP ou de Norton Rose Australia ou de Norton Rose OR S.E.N.C.R.L., s.r.l. ou de Norton Rose South Africa (constitué sous le nom de Deneys Reitz Inc.) ou d’une de ses sociétés affiliées ayant un statut et des qualifications équivalents.