Default interest

3 August 2011

Contacts

Tomas Gärdfors

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the first podcast in a series of banking law briefings under English law. My name is Tomas Gärdfors and I am a banking partner at Norton Rose LLP in London.

This session will focus on default interest under English law.

As you probably know, English courts are reluctant to interfere with a contract that has been entered into freely between parties. One of the great benefits of English law actually is that it provides certainty for commercial transactions. There are, however, exceptions to this rule. In a banking context, one of these exceptions is the rule against penalties. If the court considers that a default interest provision is a way of pressuring the other party not to breach the contract, it may well be struck down.

This should not, however, cause undue alarm - in particular lenders should take comfort from the fact that it is only additional interest payable upon a default that is at risk. Commercial parties are, in fact, free to agree the rate of interest before default.

In a syndicated lending context, a default interest provision is standard. The default interest rate should be based upon the lender’s genuine pre-estimate of the loss that he will suffer if the borrower defaults on his payment. Such loss could include increased cost of monitoring the defaulting borrower as well as increased risks inherent in lending to a borrower in default.

If the default provision is drafted as a deterrent for the borrower not to breach the contract however, it is likely to be considered a penalty and struck down as unenforceable.

The penalty rules only apply though if there is a breach of contract. Where a default interest provision is drafted to apply upon the occurrence of an event of default, such default interest could be upheld as enforceable irrespective of the rate of interest, provided however that the event of default is not linked to a breach of the contract.

In reality, it is market practice that an additional default interest can be set at 1 to 2 per cent above the agreed interest. Having said that, the specific circumstances and the documents in which the default interest is applied should always be taken into consideration.

Thank you

Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members (“the Norton Rose Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients. This publication was produced prior to 3 June 2013 when Fulbright & Jaworski LLP became a member of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein.

References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose Fulbright entity/entities”). No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director, employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this communication. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member, employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.

The purpose of this communication is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose Fulbright entity on the points of law discussed. You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.