Publication
Navigating international trade and tariffs
Impacts of evolving trade regulations and compliance risks
United States | Publication | December 2025
On December 10, 2025, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or Commission) Division of Market Oversight (DMO) issued No-Action Letter No. 25-43 (the No-Action Letter) responding to a request from the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) which sought relief from certain error correction requirements under CFTC Regulations 43.3(e) and 45.14(a).1 These regulations mandate that reporting counterparties correct errors in swap transaction and pricing data and swap data submitted to Swap Data Repositories (SDRs), regardless of whether the swap is still open or has matured.2 Market participants have expressed concerns that these obligations impose significant operational and financial burdens, particularly for swaps that have terminated or matured (commonly referred to as “Dead Swaps”).
Under the No-Action Letter, three categories of reporting data have received a correction waiver:
The CFTC requires swap market participants report transaction and pricing data under CFTC Regulations Parts 43 and 45 and obligate reporting counterparties to correct any errors in swap data submitted to SDRs, regardless of whether the swap is still open or has matured.
While ISDA noted in its request letter that it “support[s] the Commission’s mission of enhancing market transparency and price discovery, promoting financial stability and preventing market abuses,” it highlighted that the current error correction requirements impose substantial operational and financial burdens, principally for Dead Swaps and for historical data on Open Swaps. ISDA argued that the costs and practical difficulties of correcting all past errors often outweigh the regulatory benefits, particularly when the errors relate to non-critical data elements.
Accordingly, ISDA petitioned the CFTC to exercise enforcement discretion and limit mandatory corrections to key data fields pursuant to 17 C.F.R. § 140.99, which permits the Commission to issue no-action letters.
The DMO has taken the non-binding position that it will not recommend enforcement action against reporting counterparties under the following circumstances.3
First, with respect to Dead Swaps, the DMO will not pursue enforcement for failure to correct errors in swaps that matured, terminated or otherwise ceased to be open as of the effective date of the most recent changes to Part 43 or Part 45 or two years prior to the discovery of the error. However, corrections remain required for critical data elements such as Legal Entity Identifiers (LEIs), Unique Transaction Identifiers (UTIs) and data elements listed in Appendix A to Part 43.4
Second, for open swaps, the DMO will not recommend enforcement for failure to correct historical errors beyond the most recently reported data for a given swap, thereby limiting the scope of required corrections.
Third, with respect to Part 43 data, enforcement discretion applies to errors outside of Appendix A data elements and to data submitted prior to the later of the most recent rule change or one year before error discovery. These positions reflect the DMO’s recognition of the disproportionate costs associated with correcting historical data errors compared to their regulatory benefits.
This no-action relief provides meaningful regulatory flexibility for market participants. The DMO will not recommend enforcement actions against reporting counterparties for failure to undertake costly and time-consuming corrections for non-critical data elements in Dead Swaps or for historical submissions in open swaps. Instead, the DMO indicates it will focus compliance efforts on ensuring accuracy in key data fields such as LEIs, UTIs and Appendix A elements, as well as maintaining integrity in the most recent swap data submissions.
Market participants may consider reviewing and updating their internal compliance policies to reflect this relief, prioritize resources toward correcting critical data elements and maintain robust documentation of compliance decisions.
It is important to note that this relief is limited to enforcement discretion and does not absolve firms from other obligations under the Commodity Exchange Act or CFTC regulations. Firms should also monitor for any future guidance or modifications to this no-action position, as the DMO retains authority to alter or withdraw the relief at its discretion.
Special thanks to senior counsel Stephan Ariyan for assisting in the preparation of this article.
The Letter was issued pursuant to 17 C.F.R. § 140.99. Note that under 17 C.F.R. § 140.99(a)(2), “A no-action letter binds only the issuing Division . . . and not the Commission or other Commission staff.”
17 C.F.R. Part 43; 17 C.F.R. Part 45.
Note, however, that the position expressed in the No-Action Letter is limited to the DMO and does not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. Moreover, the no-action position is not binding upon the Commission. The No-Action Letter expressly provides that “Except as explicitly provided in this letter, the no-action position taken herein does not excuse persons from compliance with any applicable requirements of the CEA or Commission regulations.”
See 17 C.F.R. Part 43; 17 C.F.R. Part 45.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025