
Publication
Navigating distressed M&A
Investors and advisers have been poised for a flood of distressed M&A transactions since the early days of the pandemic.
We use cookies and other similar technology to collect data about you to allow us to deliver our online services, measure our website audience and improve your browsing experience. Full details on the cookies we use are set out in our Cookies policy. Please click OK to signify your consent to our use of cookies.
You can withdraw your consent by clicking “manage cookies” and following the instructions shown.
In his Commercial Division Update, Thomas J. Hall writes: When there is no enforceable partnership agreement, the party seeking to establish an implied partnership must show that a partnership nevertheless exists based on the conduct, intention and relationship between the parties. Although no one factor is determinative, recent Commercial Division decisions have placed a heightened emphasis on the factor of shared losses.
Download the New York Law Journal article, Commercial division update – Implied partnerships and the importance of shared losses.
Publication
Investors and advisers have been poised for a flood of distressed M&A transactions since the early days of the pandemic.
Publication
On January 18, the Competition Bureau announced a consultation process and released its promised draft enforcement guidance for the pending criminal prohibition on wage-fixing and no-poach agreements introduced in the June 2022 amendments to the Competition Act (the Act).
Publication
Rising interest rates, long-lasting inflation, supply chain uncertainty, regulatory changes, pressure for business transformation, geopolitical instability, economists predicting a global recession – dealmakers are increasingly confronted with extremely challenging conditions that affect their M&A-roadmaps.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events...
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023