Publication
International Restructuring Newswire
Welcome to the Q2 2024 edition of the Norton Rose Fulbright International Restructuring Newswire.
Australia | Publication | August 2022
The odds were not in Aristocrat Technologies Australia’s favour last week, with the High Court dismissing an appeal by the gaming technology provider over whether computerised components in their electronic gaming machines which triggered a ‘feature game’ constituted patentable subject matter.
After a long history before both the Patents Office and the courts, Aristocrat’s appeal was ultimately split evenly between the six justices of the High Court. Although in theory the ruling should provide more clarity on the increasingly important question of the patentability of computer-implemented inventions, the opposing views taken by the two camps of justices may instead have simply raised the stakes for future disputes on the issue.
Kiefel CJ, Gageler and Keane JJ held that Aristocrat’s appeal should be dismissed, on the basis that the invention failed to claim some variation or adjustment to generic computer technology so as to give effect to the new game. They considered that the invention could not be classified as more than a new method of gaming, implemented using existing conventional computer technology. The justices also found the two-step model proposed by the Full Court (asking first whether the invention claimed a computer-implemented invention and then whether it can be described as an advance in computer technology) unnecessarily complicated the test for whether an invention is patentable subject matter.
In contrast, Gordon, Edelman and Steward JJ would have allowed the appeal, finding that an abstract idea implemented on a computer, which created an artificial state of affairs and useful result, may be a patentable manner of manufacture. They emphasised that the same approach should be taken in respect of methods carried out using a computer as would be taken in considering the implementation of a scheme or idea by any other machine. They considered that the claimed operation of the game controller, displayed through the player interface, was an altered machine involving an artificial state of affairs and a useful result amounting to a manner of manufacture.
As the High Court was evenly split, the Full Court’s decision (that the alleged invention was not patentable) was affirmed.
Publication
Welcome to the Q2 2024 edition of the Norton Rose Fulbright International Restructuring Newswire.
Publication
The Canadian Federal Budget 2024 proposes to broaden the scope of certain powers allowing CRA to request information from taxpayers, and sets out new consequences for non-compliant taxpayers.
Publication
The alternative minimum tax is an additional income tax imposed under the Income Tax Act on individuals and certain trusts who would otherwise be able to reduce their ordinary Canadian federal income tax through the use of certain deductions, exemptions or credits.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023