Publication
Generative AI
Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues.
The Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") yesterday announced increased reporting thresholds under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Act").
These reporting thresholds are revised annually based on changes in the US gross national product. The increases will apply to all transactions that close after the effective date, which likely will be in mid to late February (30 days after publication of the changes in the Federal Register).
Most importantly, the minimum "size-of-transaction" threshold will be raised from US$78.2 million to US$80.8 million. Acquisitions below this threshold will not be reportable.
The new HSR dollar thresholds for 2017 will be as follows:
Threshold | 2017 adjusted threshold |
Minimum size-of-transaction | US$80.8 million |
Size-of-persons test | US$16.2 million and US$161.5 million |
Size-of-transaction above which size-of-persons test does not apply | US$323 million |
The adjustments also apply to certain other HSR Act thresholds and exemptions, such as the exemptions for acquisitions of foreign assets and voting securities.
While the HSR filing fee amounts have not changed in more than a decade, the size-of-transaction thresholds, upon which the filing fee is based, will be increased. The filing fee for each of the new thresholds will be:
2017 Size-of-Transaction Threshold | Filing Fee |
Value of transaction greater than US$80.8 million, but less than US$161.5 million | US$45,000 |
Value of transaction US$161.5 million or greater, but less than US$807.5 million | US$125,000 |
Value of transaction US$807.5 million or greater | US$280,000 |
25 percent of an issuer's voting securities if valued in excess of US$1,615 million | US$280,000 |
50 percent of an issuer's voting securities if valued at greater than US$80.8 million | US$45,000 |
Even if a transaction is reportable based on the above thresholds, it may qualify for an HSR Act exemption. Complex rules apply to the valuation and exemptions under the HSR Act and you should consult a lawyer experienced in HSR matters to determine whether a transaction is reportable.
The new thresholds will remain in effect until the next annual adjustment, expected in January or February 2018.
In a related development, the FTC also announced adjustments to the thresholds for interlocking directorates under Section 8 of the Clayton Act, which prohibits a person from serving as a director or officer in two competing corporations.
The jurisdictional thresholds under Section 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(2)(A) are revised from US$31,841,000 and US$3,184,100 to US$32,914,000 and US$3,291,400, respectively. As a result of these adjustments, Section 8 will apply to corporations with capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating more than US$32,914,000, unless the competitive sales of either corporation are less than US$3,291,400; the competitive sales of either corporation are less than two percent of that corporation's total sales; or the competitive sales of each corporation are less than four percent of that corporation's total sales.
The notice announcing these revisions will be published shortly in the Federal Register and will be effective upon publication.
Norton Rose Fulbright lawyers are well versed in the HSR Act and its reporting requirements and are available to advise parties regarding the reportability of transactions, as well as guide clients through the reporting process and any government investigation that may follow an HSR filing.
Publication
Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues.
Publication
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or the Court) recently ruled in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz & Ors v. Switzerland (Application No. 53600/20) that Switzerland had breached the European Convention of Human Rights (the Convention) by not taking sufficient action against climate change. In particular, it found a breach of the right to respect for private and family life contained in Article 8 of the Convention, based on Switzerland’s failure to mitigate the impact of climate change on the lives, health, well-being and quality of life of its citizens. It also ruled that Switzerland had breached the right to a fair trial in terms of Article 6, in that the domestic courts failed to examine the merits of the applicants’ complaints, including the scientific evidence. In this article we consider the key features of this landmark judgment, which has wide ramifications for Member States of the Convention.
Publication
We are delighted to announce that Al Hounsell, Director of Strategic Innovation & Legal Design based in our Toronto office, has been named 'Innovative Leader of the Year' at the International Legal Technology Association (ILTA) Awards.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023