
Publication
Generative AI: A global guide to key IP considerations
Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues.
Author:
United States | Publication | May 2025
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has issued a proposed rule designed to strengthen the agency’s oversight of Medicaid state directed provider tax payments (Proposed Rule).
According to CMS, the Proposed Rule targets a “loophole” in the provider tax waiver process and addresses concerns about potential “money laundering,” as described in the accompanying press release. Specifically, the Proposed Rule seeks to prevent situations where, in CMS’s view, state provider taxes exploit the federal Medicaid match system “by taxing a type of entity, drawing down a high federal match and then redistributing those dollars back to the very same entities that were taxed.” CMS contends that this practice increases federal outlays without a corresponding financial commitment from the states.
Under federal law, states are allowed to impose provider taxes that are both broad-based and uniform. “Broad-based” means the tax applies to an entire class of allowable healthcare items and services, while “uniform” indicates that the tax rate is the same rate for all items, services or providers within that class. Section 1903(w)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act allows a healthcare related tax waiver to be approved for the broad-based or uniformity requirements if the net impact of the tax and related expenditures is “generally redistributive” in nature and the amount of the tax is not directly correlated to Medicaid payments for items and services for which the tax is imposed. And it is these waivers that appear to have pushed CMS to the edge.
At its core, the new formulas and analyses are intended to:
The current statutory and regulatory framework has two statistical tests to which the state must adhere: (1) a “P1/P2” test for the “broad-based requirement;” and (2) a “B1/B2” test for the “generally redistributive” requirements. The Proposed Rule focuses on the B1/B2 test, and importantly, the preamble narratively describes the arrangements it considers exploitative of the federal match.
CMS aims to prevent states from imposing higher tax rates on Medicaid activities compared to commercial activities, even if the state meets the B1/B2 test. To clarify this, the Proposed Rule provides an example of a tax structure that would violate this new requirement: “… a tax on hospitals with less than 5% Medicaid utilization at 2% of net patient revenues for inpatient hospital services, and on all other hospitals at 4% of net patient service revenues for inpatient services would violate [the Proposed Rule].”
CMS has identified four recent state waivers in the press release—California, Michigan, Massachusetts and New York—as examples of states that are taking advantage of the Medicaid provider tax. Additionally, the Proposed Rule refers to seven unnamed states that have "existing loophole waivers" or "problematic" tax structures. Thus, suggesting the Proposed Rule could ultimately extend beyond these states and impact various programs and arrangements nationwide.
Healthcare providers should carefully review their state’s Medicaid waivers and directed payment provider tax programs to assess whether they may be vulnerable to an adverse interpretation under the Proposed Rule. Stakeholders who wish to provide input on the Proposed Rule must submit their comments to CMS no later than July 14, 2025.
Our team of experienced lawyers and professionals at Norton Rose Fulbright will closely watch the development and finalization of the Proposed Rule. If you have any questions related to Medicaid state directed payment provider tax programs, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Publication
Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues.
Publication
Recent tariffs and other trade measures have transformed the international trade landscape, impacting almost every sector, region and business worldwide.
Publication
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa is acting on behalf of the Helen Suzman Foundation (HSF) in its application to be admitted as an amicus curiae in the ongoing High Court litigation regarding the state’s failure to prosecute apartheid-era crimes.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025