Publication
Building long-term integrity in the voluntary carbon market
In recent years, an important question has arisen in relation to the voluntary carbon market (VCM) as it continues to expand: How do we elevate and maintain its integrity?
Proposed amendments would substantially expand NSPS OOOO
Publication | August 2015
On August 18, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") fired another salvo in the agency's efforts to combat climate change, proposing new methane and volatile organic compound ("VOC") regulations under the Clean Air Act ("CAA") for the oil and natural gas sector.1
Specifically, the EPA is proposing expansive amendments to Subpart OOOO, the New Source Performance Standards ("NSPS") for the Oil and Natural Gas Sector. The proposal addresses new, modified, and reconstructed emissions sources across the entire sector, as follows:
In general, the standards for new or expanded sources will be the same or similar to those under the current version of Subpart OOOO. However, the proposed fugitive emissions standards for well sites and compressor stations would be based on the use of an optical gas imaging device (e.g., infrared camera). This requirement and reduced emission completion ("REC") requirements for oil wells appear to be the most significant of the new and expanded control provisions.
Potentially more significant than the proposed methane control requirements, the EPA is requesting comments on "next generation compliance" options. This request may be laying the foundation for eventual requirements, such as use of third-party auditors to certify compliance, submission of third-party reports directly to the EPA, and professional engineer certification that vent systems will meet a "no venting" standard.
Like all of EPA's climate change regulations, the proposal will receive much scrutiny. Further details regarding the proposal are discussed below.
As expected, the new proposal arrives in the form of amendments to NSPS Subpart OOOO. When Subpart OOOO was finalized in 2012, the EPA declined to impose explicit requirements for methane reductions. The agency subsequently received petitions for reconsideration in which environmental advocacy groups urged the Administrator to adopt standards for the "methane pollution" released by the oil and gas sector.
The EPA states in the preamble to the proposed rule that the new regulations are the agency's response to these petitions for reconsideration. The preamble also notes that the EPA has, over the last several years, collected significant data on oil and gas sector methane emissions through the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and, in 2014, issued several white papers summarizing sector emissions and potential mitigation technologies.
Lastly, the preamble notes that proposed regulations follow through on President Obama's 2013 Climate Action Plan and Methane Strategy and the EPA's own goal of cutting oil and gas sector methane emissions by 40 to 45% from 2012 levels by 2025.
In the preamble, the EPA states that the Best System of Emissions Reduction ("BSER")—the control standard for new, modified, and reconstructed NSPS sources—is generally the same for methane as it is for VOCs. Accordingly, the proposal generally expands the application of the types of existing VOC controls contained in the current version of Subpart OOOO. The new and expanded requirements would apply to those constructed, modified, or reconstructed after the publication date of the proposal.
The EPA is also proposing modifications to the current requirements in Subpart OOOO. These changes would apply to affected facilities that are already subject to Subpart OOOO. The most significant of these amendments are:
With the possible exception of the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule, which was specifically mandated by Congress, every EPA rule concerning GHGs has faced extensive litigation. This rule will be no different.
However, the most significant issue in the proposal may not be the proposed methane limits, but the EPA's request for comments regarding "next generation compliance" options. These could presage requirements to employ third-party auditors to inspect and certify compliance and even provisions mandating that auditors submit compliance reports directly to the EPA.
A possible professional engineer certification for vent systems and control devices could be another issue. The EPA seems to be aiming towards a "no venting" standard similar to that currently imposed in Colorado. The professional engineer would have to verify and certify that the closed vent system is designed to handle all reasonably expected emissions scenarios, including flash emissions, such that thief hatches and other devices would not relieve during normal operations. If such a requirement were adopted, it would have a very significant effect on many facilities, particularly minor sources that are currently authorized by permits that allow emissions from such devices as long as annual emissions are below specified levels.
If next generation compliance options were to be finalized, it is almost certain that they will begin appearing in future rules as well, especially if the EPA's budgets keep getting cut and enforcement resources continue to dwindle. The overall impact of these types of requirements on CAA enforcement could be similar to Title V.
1 The proposal has not yet been published in the Federal Register. A pre-publication draft of the proposed rule is available at: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas/pdfs/og_nsps_pr_081815.pdf. The EPA has not proposed an extended comment period. Accordingly, comments must be submitted within 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Publication
In recent years, an important question has arisen in relation to the voluntary carbon market (VCM) as it continues to expand: How do we elevate and maintain its integrity?
Publication
Welcome to the Q2 2024 edition of the Norton Rose Fulbright International Restructuring Newswire.
Publication
On 16 April 2024, the Hon Tanya Plibersek MP, the Minister for the Environment and Water (the Minister) announced progress on the package of reforms to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act).
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023