Publication
Greece
The applicable legislation establishing a national screening mechanism for foreign direct investments (FDI) and implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/452 in Greece is Law 5202/2025, which was adopted on 22 May 2025 (Greek FDI Law).
Author:
Canada | Publication | November 14, 2022
As of November 10, 2022, most provincially regulated Ontario employees should have their employer’s electronic monitoring policy in hand (or in their inbox). If your organization has not prepared and distributed this policy, it is time to do so.
In April 2022, Ontario made changes to the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) requiring designated employers to adopt a workplace “electronic monitoring policy.” An employer must adopt this policy if:
Employers who had 25 or more employees as of January 1, 2022, were required to have the policy in place by October 11, 2022, and provide it to employees by November 10, 2022.
In future, if an employer has 25 employees or more for the first time on January 1 of a given year its policy must be in place as of March 1 that year.
The requirements for an electronic monitoring policy are limited to informing employees of how, when and why they are monitored electronically. The policy must be in writing and describe:
If an employer does not conduct electronic monitoring of employees it must still adopt a policy to that effect. An employer may create multiple policies applicable to different employees, either in a single document or in multiple documents.
“Electronic monitoring” includes all forms of monitoring of employees that are done electronically. Examples include:
The scope of the required information in the policy is not limited to monitoring of employer-owned devices or monitoring that occurs while employees are at the workplace. If the employer electronically monitors employees in any way, including on their personal devices, at home or after working hours, details of such monitoring must be captured in the policy.
A written copy of the electronic monitoring policy must be provided to each employee within 30 days of:
The employer may provide employees with a copy of its policy through a printed copy, an email attachment if the employee can print a copy, or a link to the document online if the employee has a reasonable opportunity to access the document and a printer.
An employer is required to retain copies of every written electronic monitoring policy for three years after it ceases to be in effect.
Employees may make a complaint to the director of employment standards if the employer has not provided them with a copy of its electronic monitoring policy by the required deadlines. Unionized employees may grieve a failure to disseminate the policy.
An employer may be ordered by an employment standards officer or labour arbitrator to comply by issuing the policy.
The ESA amendments specifically state that the requirement for an electronic monitoring policy does not affect or limit an employer’s ability to use information obtained through electronic monitoring of its employees. The policy requirement does not create new privacy rights for employees beyond the requirement to inform employees of the nature and extent of electronic monitoring.
However, unreasonable electronic monitoring of employees may still trigger liabilities outside of the ESA.
Publication
The applicable legislation establishing a national screening mechanism for foreign direct investments (FDI) and implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/452 in Greece is Law 5202/2025, which was adopted on 22 May 2025 (Greek FDI Law).
Publication
The UK Government’s Department for Transport (the DfT) has published its Maritime Decarbonisation Strategy, setting out its plan for decarbonising maritime and new decarbonisation goals for the UK domestic maritime sector.
Publication
On 29 May 2025, in Finlayson v Caterpillar Financial Services Corp [2025] UKPC 24 (The Bahamas), the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom (the Privy Council) heard the appeal of Mr Garet O Finlayson and Mr Mark Finlayson (the Appellants) following the Supreme Court of the Bahamas and the Court of Appeal of the Bahamas finding in favour of the respondent, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the Respondent).
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025