
Publication
Hopcraft
On August 1, 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited judgment in Hopcraft v Close Brothers Limited and on 3 August the FCA announced it would consult on a redress scheme.
Canada | Publication | April 4, 2025
Costs awards in trademark opposition proceedings have been long anticipated in Canada. On April 1, 2025, the Registrar of Trademarks issued a practice notice detailing the procedures and criteria for awarding costs in trademark proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, and 45 of the Trademarks Act.
Costs are intended to be awarded only in exceptional cases. The practice notice outlines the following circumstances:
However, unreasonable conduct is a broad category and includes pursuing a ground of opposition that has no reasonable chance of success.
Cost consequences are tied to a request for a hearing. A party may request costs within 14 days after a hearing ends or is cancelled, or within 14 days after the end of the period for filing a request for a hearing, if none is requested. If the opposition or application is withdrawn prior to a hearing request, the Registrar does not have authority to order costs.
The amount of any costs award will be based on the prescribed fees for initiating the proceeding (current fees for initiating opposition proceedings in Canada are $1,085). The Registrar will provide reasons for the decision on costs in the final disposition of the proceeding. A certified copy of an order for costs may be filed in the Federal Court and enforced as an order of that court.
It remains to be seen whether potential cost consequences will affect trademark oppositions in Canada. Compared to the cost of opposition proceedings, the potential costs award is low, and the circumstances in which a costs award will be granted are limited. While potential costs award might deter some parties, and may check some unreasonable conduct, most cases will not likely be subject to a costs award. Even though costs may not always be awarded, the possibility may encourage parties to request them.
Publication
On August 1, 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited judgment in Hopcraft v Close Brothers Limited and on 3 August the FCA announced it would consult on a redress scheme.
Publication
The UK Emissions Trading Scheme Authority (consisting of the UK Government and relevant devolved administrations) (the Authority) has released an interim response (the Response) following its November 2024 consultation which considered implementing the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (the UK ETS) for the maritime sector and the potential further expansion of the UK ETS to additional maritime emissions.
Publication
On 26 June 2025, in Ocean Clap Shipping Ltd v Global Offshore Services Bv and another company [2025] EWHC 1591 (Comm), the UK Commercial Court (the Court) provided guidance on the principles that apply when assessing whether a contract has been formed by conduct and illustrated the practical implications of the distinction between “see to it” and “on demand” guarantee obligations.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025