
Publication
Hopcraft
On August 1, 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited judgment in Hopcraft v Close Brothers Limited and on 3 August the FCA announced it would consult on a redress scheme.
United Kingdom | Publication | August 2025
The Regulator has published a blog on pensions adequacy and the challenges facing DC pension savers. It highlights recent research by the DWP showing that the “emerging norm” is that many people struggle to prepare for retirement.
In the blog, trustees are asked to consider their decumulation strategies to deliver better retirement outcomes. Three steps for trustees to take to address the challenge of adequacy:
The Regulator highlights that DC savers, particularly renters and those without other savings, risk reaching retirement with too few options. The Regulator urges trustees to develop their role to ensure DC savers achieve good outcomes in retirement and to go beyond asset stewardship by becoming enablers of good retirement outcomes. By this the Regulator envisages trustees offering tailored support, guiding savers through complex retirement decisions, and ensuring schemes are governed to high standards.
Publication
On August 1, 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited judgment in Hopcraft v Close Brothers Limited and on 3 August the FCA announced it would consult on a redress scheme.
Publication
The UK Emissions Trading Scheme Authority (consisting of the UK Government and relevant devolved administrations) (the Authority) has released an interim response (the Response) following its November 2024 consultation which considered implementing the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (the UK ETS) for the maritime sector and the potential further expansion of the UK ETS to additional maritime emissions.
Publication
On 26 June 2025, in Ocean Clap Shipping Ltd v Global Offshore Services Bv and another company [2025] EWHC 1591 (Comm), the UK Commercial Court (the Court) provided guidance on the principles that apply when assessing whether a contract has been formed by conduct and illustrated the practical implications of the distinction between “see to it” and “on demand” guarantee obligations.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025