Publication
Motor Finance Redress: The Way Ahead
On August 1, 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited judgment in Hopcraft v Close Brothers Limited and on 3 August the FCA announced it would consult on a redress scheme.
Author:
United States | Publication | March 2020
Updated: March 30, 2020
As the US reacts and adjusts to the developing COVID-19 (coronavirus) situation, the two federal antitrust agencies – the Federal Trade Commission and the US Department of Justice Antitrust Division – have revised certain rules and procedures to their civil merger investigation processes to address these new challenges.
The FTC and DOJ have shifted most personnel to remote work arrangements, but agency staff have demonstrated a willingness to be reasonable and accommodating as both the agencies and merging parties navigate the developing impacts of COVID-19. The agencies are in the process of testing the full capacity of their remote work systems. Although our antitrust lawyers have received no indication this is the case, should agency IT systems be unable to support remote access volumes, agency staff may be forced to triage workload to accommodate system limitations. The FTC has indicated it will modify timing agreements where “an unmodified time period does not allow [the FTC] to address competitive concerns.”1 Similarly, the DOJ has indicated a willingness to “revisit its timing agreements with merging parties in light of further developments.” 2
Norton Rose Fulbright’s antitrust and competition team provides the following update regarding the state of US antitrust transaction reviews.
Publication
On August 1, 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited judgment in Hopcraft v Close Brothers Limited and on 3 August the FCA announced it would consult on a redress scheme.
Publication
In this issue of our Compliance Quarterly Türkiye, we continue to inform our clients about the global and local compliance rules and regulations which impact Turkish businesses.
Publication
Songa Product and Chemical Tankers III AS v Kairos Shipping II LLC [2025] EWCA Civ 1227 (07 October 2025) has clarified the extent of the obligation on the Charterer to redeliver a vessel following the termination of a Barecon 2001 charter and of the Owner’s right to require it to be redelivered to a port “convenient to them”.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025