Publication
Blue Bonds: Making a splash in the Capital Markets
In 2018, the Republic of Seychelles launched the first-ever “blue bond”, with the support of the World Bank Group and the Global Environment Facility.
Reputational Risk Australia - 2019 Survey Report
An analysis of workplace risk
Australia | Publication | December 2019
What does reputational risk mean to Australian organisations? Read our Reputational Risk Australia report to find out.
When it comes to questions of reputation in the workplace, the shadow of the Hayne Royal Commission hangs heavy over major Australian organisations.
In the year of Hayne’s landmark report on the conduct of Australian financial institutions, measuring, assessing and improving workplace culture has taken on new urgency and heightened feelings of exposure to reputational risk issues.
Norton Rose Fulbright surveyed 132 leaders across business and government between August and September 2019 to further its understanding of what reputational risk means to today’s organisations. The results of this research, taken together with the views gathered in our inaugural Reputational Risk Australia report in 2017, are detailed in this report.
The results clearly show a growing intensity of concern about workplace reputational issues. Major organisations are becoming both more sensitive to reputational risk and more willing to identify its key drivers.
To find out more about what reputational risk means to Australian organisations and benchmark your business against your peers, read our full report.
For more information, contact one of our employment and labour and risk advisory experts below.
Partner | Global Co-Head and Team Leader of Employment & Labour
Email
jason.noakes@nortonrosefulbright.com
Partner
Email
abigail.mcgregor@nortonrosefulbright.com
Australian Chair and Global Head of Restructuring
Email
scott.atkins@nortonrosefulbright.com
Senior Advisor - Risk Advisory
Email
jeremy.moller@nortonrosefulbright.com
Recent publications
Publication
The parallel imposition requirement in exclusive distribution systems: key takeaways from the CJEU’s ruling in Beevers Kaas
On 8 May 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the CJEU) delivered its ruling in case C-581/23 (the Ruling), providing guidance on one of the conditions for an exclusive distribution agreement to benefit from the block exemption under Article 4(b)(i) of the 2010 Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (the VBER)1, notably the so-called ‘parallel imposition requirement’.
Publication
Global antitrust and competition trends: 2025 hot topics
Antitrust authorities are increasingly aggressive in pursuing new theories of harm, pushing the boundaries of what amounts to an antitrust violation, and expanding the use of current legislation and regulation to fit a new era of issues.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .