
Publication
Blue Bonds: Making a splash in the Capital Markets
In 2018, the Republic of Seychelles launched the first-ever “blue bond”, with the support of the World Bank Group and the Global Environment Facility.
United States | Publication | May 2025
On May 1, 2025, the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee voted to advance draft legislation that would, among other changes to administrative agencies, abolish the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and move its operations and ambit to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The PCAOB is a nonprofit government corporation created by the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) that oversees the audits of public companies and SEC-registered brokers and dealers. The PCAOB’s current role includes publishing Standards and Rules for accounting firms, conducting inspection reports of registered public accounting firms, and undertaking enforcement actions regarding its rules.
The SEC appoints each PCAOB board member and has the power to modify or overturn the PCAOB. Two members of the board are required to be Certified Public Accountants.
The draft legislation includes potential legislative enactments to be included in the 2025 budget plan currently being negotiated in Congress. One such proposal would abolish the PCAOB and transfer its functions to the SEC within a year of enactment.
The bill provides that “existing processes and regulations of the [PCAOB], including existing [PCAOB] auditing standards, shall continue in effect unless modified through rule making by the [SEC].” That being said, the draft legislation would result in potentially dramatic changes in how those “processes and regulations” are carried out. While the draft legislation provides that employees at the PCAOB “may” be offered equivalent positions at the SEC, the draft legislation would cap any salaries beyond that of “similarly situated employees of the [SEC].” This salary cap could prove important because salaries at the PCAOB are not subject to government pay scales. Thus, under the draft legislation the SEC may have difficulties in retaining technocrats adroit in auditing standards to carry out the functions previously assigned to the PCAOB.
Further, the draft legislation would fundamentally change fees charged under SOX, which compromise the largest source of funding for the PCAOB. Currently, certain issuers, investment companies and broker dealers of a requisite size must pay an "accounting support fee" in connection with audited financials by PCAOB-registered firms. Under the draft legislation, the SEC would be unable to collect these fees and the balance of remaining account support fees would be directed to the Treasury. Thus, the PCAOB's functions would cease to be independently funded.
The draft legislation is far from enactment and it may not pass or may pass after substantial revision. Still, any company that uses accounting firms that are subject to the PCAOB should monitor this potential change as it could affect how audits are conducted in the future. There could be changes to the substantive policies underlying audits. Further, the elimination of independent funding under the “accounting support fee” as well as potential loss of personnel could impact how and how often enforcement against auditing firms is conducted.
Of course, both auditing firms and non-auditing entities should continue to follow PCAOB guidance and enforcement as no change has been enacted and auditing standards would survive under the new legislation.
Publication
In 2018, the Republic of Seychelles launched the first-ever “blue bond”, with the support of the World Bank Group and the Global Environment Facility.
Publication
On 8 May 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the CJEU) delivered its ruling in case C-581/23 (the Ruling), providing guidance on one of the conditions for an exclusive distribution agreement to benefit from the block exemption under Article 4(b)(i) of the 2010 Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (the VBER)1, notably the so-called ‘parallel imposition requirement’.
Publication
Antitrust authorities are increasingly aggressive in pursuing new theories of harm, pushing the boundaries of what amounts to an antitrust violation, and expanding the use of current legislation and regulation to fit a new era of issues.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025