Publication
Motor Finance Redress: The Way Ahead
On August 1, 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited judgment in Hopcraft v Close Brothers Limited and on 3 August the FCA announced it would consult on a redress scheme.
Canada | Publication | February 25, 2025
The Government of Canada recently added seven entities to the designated list of terrorist groups under the Criminal Code. All seven entities are transnational criminal organizations operating out of Mexico and Latin America, with networks in the US and Canada. The announcement follows the US designation of many of the same entities as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists.
These steps are directly related to the government’s $1.3 billion commitment to strengthen Canada-US border security. This commitment relates to President Trump’s threats to impose tariffs on Canadian imports due to alleged concerns about the flow of fentanyl and illegal immigration from Canada into the US.
Canadian companies operating in areas of Latin America where the newly designated terrorist entities operate must take extra precautions, as the cartels may operate in some areas as quasi-governmental entities, controlling nearly all aspects of local society.
Canadian businesses operating in these regions should review their due diligence and compliance policies and practices, their supply chains and partners, and adjust as required.
A terrorist designation under the Criminal Code carries significant implications, not only for those directly affiliated with the designated entities, but also for any individuals or entities whose efforts even indirectly could be viewed as supporting a designated group.
The seven newly designated entities are all major drug cartels operating primarily out of Latin America:
The government has stated that the designation is due to the terrorist activity the organizations participate in, in addition to their roles in drug trafficking.1
The Criminal Code prohibits wilfully collecting or providing, directly or indirectly, property, financial or other related services to listed terrorist entities intending or knowing they will be used in a way that benefits the terrorist entity or supports terrorist activity.
There is very little case law on these Criminal Code provisions and some risk that its application could be unpredictable. For example, some judges may interpret the provision to include situations where the mere risk that funds could find their way into unclean hands is enough to make them illegal.
There are very limited exceptions for individuals or organizations whose acts are carried out “for the sole purpose” of providing humanitarian assistance, as long as reasonable efforts are maintained to minimize any benefit to terrorist groups.1
Entities can also apply for a ministerial permit to carry out certain activities; however receiving such an authorization is not automatic and is subject to significant due diligence by the government.
The Government of Canada has continued to expand and strengthen Canada’s anti-money laundering, anti-terrorist financing, and sanctions laws, including to facilitate easier prosecution of some of these offences.
Legal and reputational risks mean Canadian companies must be diligent when operating in regions with a cartel presence.
Canadian businesses operating in these regions should review their due diligence and compliance policies and practices, their supply chains and partners, and adjust as required.
The authors would like to thank Ian Chesney, articling student, for his contribution to preparing this legal update.
Public Safety Canada, “Government of Canada lists seven transnational criminal organizations as terrorist entities” (February 20 2025).
Publication
On August 1, 2025, the UK Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited judgment in Hopcraft v Close Brothers Limited and on 3 August the FCA announced it would consult on a redress scheme.
Publication
In this issue of our Compliance Quarterly Türkiye, we continue to inform our clients about the global and local compliance rules and regulations which impact Turkish businesses.
Publication
Songa Product and Chemical Tankers III AS v Kairos Shipping II LLC [2025] EWCA Civ 1227 (07 October 2025) has clarified the extent of the obligation on the Charterer to redeliver a vessel following the termination of a Barecon 2001 charter and of the Owner’s right to require it to be redelivered to a port “convenient to them”.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025