Energy-oil-and-gas-refinery-lng

Impact of the Upstream Petroleum Resources Development Bill on SA’s oil and gas industry

Publication January 2020


Introduction

The Draft Upstream Petroleum Resources Development Bill (Bill) was published on December 24, 2019, just over a month after the 2nd Investment Conference during which President Cyril Ramaphosa stated that the South African Government would be taking steps to provide greater policy certainty and a stable environment for investment in the South African oil and gas sector.

Oil and gas exploration and production is currently regulated under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 (MPRDA). The Bill will repeal and replace the relevant sections pertaining to upstream petroleum activities in the MPRDA.

Implementation of key policy goals

BEE Participation

It is an imperative of the Bill to meaningfully expand opportunities for black persons to enter into and actively participate in the upstream petroleum sector and to benefit from the exploitation of the nation’s petroleum resources.

The Bill aims to achieve this by providing that every exploration and production right must have a minimum of 10 per cent participating interest held by black persons. The Bill also empowers the Minister to reserve certain exploration or production areas for 100 per cent black-owned companies, and allows the Minister to tailor the requirements which apply to individual applications so as to promote the development of local black-owned companies in the industry.

The Bill has been drafted to make it clear that the so-called ‘Once Empowered Always Empowered’ principle, which would enable investors to claim recognition for previous BEE transactions, does not apply. The Bill imposes a continuous requirement to maintain the required BEE participation level.

While ensuring that the nation’s mineral wealth provides direct benefit to South Africans is an important policy goal, there are challenges presented by these requirements. Exploration activities are extremely costly and risky, with the drilling of a single well costing up to US$250m, and with only one out of every seven wells successful. Since commercial banks usually do not fund exploration activities, interested black economic empowerment partners will have to provide large capital investments in order to meet their obligations in respect of these activities.

State Participation

In terms of State participation, the Bill grants the State, through PetroSA, an option to acquire a 20 per cent carried interest in all exploration and production rights (the non-state holders of such rights can recover development and production costs of the State’s carried interest from the State’s portion of proceeds generated from production operations). Additionally the Bill empowers the Minister to, by Government Gazette notice, direct production right holders to sell a certain volume of South African-produced oil and gas to the State to provide for the country’s strategic stock.

These provisions provide the State with guaranteed participation in successful oil and gas discoveries, because the State can decide in which rights they would like to participate while their costs are party carried. Although the Bill states that development and production costs can be recovered by non-state holders, the details of this cost recovery are not dealt with in the Bill and are likely to be published in separate legislation by the Minister of Finance. Consequently, until this financial legislation is promulgated, it will be very difficult for oil and gas companies to make an informed decision whether to invest or further invest in South African upstream activities. We trust that the promulgation of such financial legislation is imminent as the delay thereof would frustrate Government’s own objective to accelerate exploration and production activities in South Africa.

Support for investment and creation of legal certainty and stability

A key objective of the State is to create legal certainty and stability, the lack of which has been a significant obstacle to investment in the industry in the past, owing to the beleaguered Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Amendment Bill, which was finally abandoned in 2019.

The Bill aims to create certainty by providing that the Minster of Minerals, Resources and Energy must determine the terms and conditions of a production right on the granting of the corresponding exploration right. This must be honoured by the State, should the holders of the relevant exploration right ever apply for a production right in respect of the relevant area.

While this is positive, the Bill (which to emphasise, is still in draft form and is subject to change) is unfortunately lacking in key areas which undermines the objective of ensuring that the legal requirements relating to petroleum exploration and production are clear and certain. Elements of continuing uncertainty include:

  • How existing exploration rights which do not have corresponding production right terms will be dealt with.
  • How the exclusive right of the holder of a technical cooperation permit and/or exploration right to apply for an exploration right or production right applies, alongside the new application-by-invitation regime envisaged under the Bill.
  • The details of royalties, a production bonus and the new petroleum resource rent tax contemplated in the Bill (to be created by a subsequent act of Parliament and promulgated by the Minister of Finance) which will apply to holders of exploration and production rights.

Transitional provisions

Uncertainty is unfortunately compounded by the fact that the Bill lacks clear transitional provisions, which could result in holders of exploration and production rights being in breach of the new law and may result in suspension, termination or fines for the relevant holders.

In particular, the Bill does not provide for a reasonable time during which right holders can negotiate and implement agreements with new BEE partners. This appears not to be in the best interest of the potential BEE partner, nor the holder.

The provision of a transition period to move from one regulatory regime to another is common practice in our law. This was the case when the MPRDA was promulgated in 2004 during which holders were given three years to transition from the regulatory regime which previously prevailed. Similar provisions would remove this uncertainty.

Future of oil and gas in SA

The Bill, serving as an exclusive piece of legislation for upstream oil and gas activities in South Africa, is an important step in accelerating upstream activities in the country, which is much needed to stimulate our economy. It is positive that the State has been able to draft the Bill in a very short period of time. While there are challenges with some provisions, interested and affected parties have until February 21, 2020 to submit their comments on the Bill. We are hopeful that through the consultation process, a harmonisation between government objectives and those of the industry will be achieved.



Recent publications

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events...