
Publication
Blue Bonds: Making a splash in the Capital Markets
In 2018, the Republic of Seychelles launched the first-ever “blue bond”, with the support of the World Bank Group and the Global Environment Facility.
Author:
Publication | March 2017
In early 2017 the Ontario Ministry of Labour issued a clarifying statement on the definition of “critical injury” under Regulation 834 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. This clarification will be of interest for all employers facing a potentially reportable injury in the workplace. While not binding, it illustrates what the Ministry of Labour will consider appropriate practices for Ontario employers in reporting workplace injuries.
Any critical injury in the workplace triggers the following obligations:
Regulation 834 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act defines critical injury as follows:
“critically injured” means an injury of a serious nature that,
(a) places life in jeopardy,
(b) produces unconsciousness,
(c) results in substantial loss of blood,
(d) involves the fracture of a leg or arm but not a finger or toe,
(e) involves the amputation of a leg, arm, hand or foot but not a finger or toe,
(f) consists of burns to a major portion of the body, or
(g) causes the loss of sight in an eye.
Under a strict reading of the above definition the fracture or amputation of a finger or toe is not a critical injury.
The Ministry of Labour’s clarifying statement, however, makes clear that the ministry will also view the fracture or amputation of more than one finger or more than one toe to be a critical injury for the purposes of the legislation if it is an injury of a serious nature.
The clarifying statement is not a legal amendment of the Occupational Health and Safety Act or its Regulation 834, nor is it an interpretation of this legislation by a court that would have binding effect.
However, it is a guideline that will inform the judgment of the Ministry of Labour, its inspectors and prosecutors. Employers should expect inspectors to treat this broader scope of workplace injuries as critical injuries. This means that where such injuries occur, the accident scene should be secured, the injury reported and a written report should be sent to the Ministry of Labour as with a critical injury to avoid negative scrutiny by the Ministry of Labour. The ministry will likely issue orders and failure-to-report charges if the employer does not follow its clarifying statement and its expanded view of injuries considered critical.
Publication
In 2018, the Republic of Seychelles launched the first-ever “blue bond”, with the support of the World Bank Group and the Global Environment Facility.
Publication
We are delighted to be participating in Marine Money Week New York 2025. As one of the landmark events for the global shipping finance community, and with the global shipping and maritime industry at such a pivotal juncture, we look forward to catching up with clients and contacts to continue discussions around navigating the current challenges and opportunities.
Publication
On 8 May 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the CJEU) delivered its ruling in case C-581/23 (the Ruling), providing guidance on one of the conditions for an exclusive distribution agreement to benefit from the block exemption under Article 4(b)(i) of the 2010 Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (the VBER)1, notably the so-called ‘parallel imposition requirement’.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025