Publication
Legal strategies to tackle fraud in early-stage investments in Asia
In the wake of the recent eFishery scandal early-stage investors are recalibrating their approach to due diligence and risk tolerance.
Canada | Publication | April 4, 2025
Costs awards in trademark opposition proceedings have been long anticipated in Canada. On April 1, 2025, the Registrar of Trademarks issued a practice notice detailing the procedures and criteria for awarding costs in trademark proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, and 45 of the Trademarks Act.
Costs are intended to be awarded only in exceptional cases. The practice notice outlines the following circumstances:
However, unreasonable conduct is a broad category and includes pursuing a ground of opposition that has no reasonable chance of success.
Cost consequences are tied to a request for a hearing. A party may request costs within 14 days after a hearing ends or is cancelled, or within 14 days after the end of the period for filing a request for a hearing, if none is requested. If the opposition or application is withdrawn prior to a hearing request, the Registrar does not have authority to order costs.
The amount of any costs award will be based on the prescribed fees for initiating the proceeding (current fees for initiating opposition proceedings in Canada are $1,085). The Registrar will provide reasons for the decision on costs in the final disposition of the proceeding. A certified copy of an order for costs may be filed in the Federal Court and enforced as an order of that court.
It remains to be seen whether potential cost consequences will affect trademark oppositions in Canada. Compared to the cost of opposition proceedings, the potential costs award is low, and the circumstances in which a costs award will be granted are limited. While potential costs award might deter some parties, and may check some unreasonable conduct, most cases will not likely be subject to a costs award. Even though costs may not always be awarded, the possibility may encourage parties to request them.
Publication
In the wake of the recent eFishery scandal early-stage investors are recalibrating their approach to due diligence and risk tolerance.
Publication
As we stand on the cusp of transformative change within the energy sector, anticipation builds around the UK government’s impending decision on the Review of Electricity Market Arrangements (REMA). This briefing provides a recap of the proposals made to date and looks at the potential future impact of the REMA proposals on market players.
Publication
Antitrust authorities are increasingly aggressive in pursuing new theories of harm, pushing the boundaries of what amounts to an antitrust violation, and expanding the use of current legislation and regulation to fit a new era of issues.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025