• Global asset management quarterly

    Key developments that will be of interest to and affect our asset management clients, including market trends and developments in tax and buy-side regulation.

    June 09, 2016

  • Asset management quarterly - Europe

    Brexit, Brexit, Brexit. You would be hard-pushed to have missed the debate, which is set to be decided one way or another on 23 June 2016. The impact of the forthcoming referendum on fundraising has been significant and protracted, with the fund IPO market struggling to woo investors who are uncertain of what the future may bring should Vote Leave prevail. Uncertainty over the result has stalled a number of  deals, although the secondary fundraising market (particularly for private funds) remains robust.

    June 09, 2016

  • Newsletter Technologie et Innovation

    Nous avons le plaisir de vous transmettre le numéro 18 de notre Newsletter Technologie & Innovation consacrée aux dernières actualités législatives et jurisprudentielles. Cette Newsletter vous sera périodiquement adressée. Si vous souhaitez que nous diffusions cette Newsletter auprès d'autres membres de votre équipe ou de votre entité, n'hésitez pas à nous en faire la demande par email à l'adresse suivante : carole.guettier@nortonrosefulbright.com. Vous pouvez également vous désinscrire à tout moment à cette même adresse email.

    June 06, 2016

  • Timeline to Brexit

    Timeline in the event of a Brexit

    June 01, 2016

  • Brexit scenarios

    Subject to the outcome of any negotiations, the UK might adopt a number of models, including one of the following five:

    June 01, 2016

  • Brexit - Q&A: business analysis


    June 01, 2016

  • Q&A with Richard Naimark

    We speak with Richard Naimark, Senior Vice President of ICDR Global Operations, about the ICDR’s extensive presence in Latin America, its efforts to address party and counsel misbehavior, and its unique experience with implementing and managing emergency arbitrators.

    May 25, 2016

  • The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements

    The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements might achieve for litigation what the New York Convention managed for arbitration. It should be taken into account in any strategic planning around disputes and dispute resolution, although it has not had time to build up a hinterland of case law and academic publishing.

    May 25, 2016

  • Non-signatories to arbitration agreements

    Where a non-signatory is involved in performing a contract it may be bound by the arbitration agreement. ‘Good faith’ will play a role, as case law concerning the ‘group of companies’ doctrine reveals. The solution is to be absolutely clear in your arbitration agreement as to whether you wish it to extend to non-signatories involved in a project.

    May 25, 2016

  • Federal Court of Australia

    In Australia, any attempt to derail the arbitration process by involving the courts will be looked upon unfavourably. If you are unhappy with the process, go to the tribunal, wait for them to decide on the issues you raise, and do not seek court intervention prematurely. This point was underlined in 2015 when the Federal Court of Australia dismissed a challenge to the appointment of two arbitrators in the Sino Dragon v Noble Resources dispute.

    May 25, 2016

  • Not found what you are looking for

    Try searching our global site instead