Publication
Generative AI
Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues.
Global | Publication | August 2018
Given the news coming out of COAG’s meeting today that further negotiation on the design of the NEG will take place, it is timely to consider whether the PPAs of the past are “NEG Ready” and the current evolving approach to NEG under PPAs entering the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM).
The NEG proposes to mandate that electricity retailers and some large customers who purchase electricity directly from the NEM will be required to meet both reliability and emissions reduction requirements.
As the NEM is an energy-only market, “in front of the meter” PPAs in NEM-connected projects are typically structured as financial contracts and do not provide for physical supply. However, with the increasing uptake of corporate PPAs, the typical financial contracts between generator and purchaser may also be supplemented by standard or bespoke retail arrangements.
Parties (whether offtaker or “customer”) to existing PPAs and those looking at new PPAs will need to be alive to the risk allocations under their PPA arrangements if the NEG is adopted. In particular, the impacts on price and the response (or otherwise) of any contractual provisions relating to legal and/or regulatory changes.
Generally in the past 12-18 months, renewable PPAs whether with retailers or corporates have typically adopted a two-pronged change in law regime:
Whilst we would caution against considering a one-size-fits-all approach to the treatment of NEG under these existing regimes, and each PPA would need to be considered on its individual terms as to the impact of the introduction of the NEG, there are some key aspects to consider in each case:
Will the introduction of the NEG trigger general change in law protections under existing PPAs?
This will turn on multiple considerations including:
Will the introduction of the NEG trigger “green scheme” protections under existing PPAs?
This too will turn on certain considerations including:
Following the rhetoric around the NEG late last year, the new wave of PPAs entering the market continue to evaluate how to treat the NEG in the risk allocation between parties and the contractual process adopted to deal with the NEG.
Whilst there may be multiple ways to address this contractually, many of which will largely depend on the parties’ respective positions on risk allocation and “must haves” versus “nice to haves”, one thing is clear, new PPAs should, at least for now, be contemplating the NEG expressly and incorporating a regime to deal with it, if and when it eventuates.
In our experience, particularly when we look back at similar assessments when carbon pricing was introduced, the key broad considerations would include:
The parties will need to consider their baseline requirements. For example, generators requiring debt finance, may have to reach certain bankability thresholds in terms of risk allocation to ensure certainty of their revenue stream and minimise or exclude erosion by unknown costs. Retailers and affected customers will consider the commercial impact to their business of the NEG requirements and whether or not they can internally manage that at no cost or minimal costs to the business or whether there are alternative ways to manage the risk without passing risk to the generators.
As always with change in law regimes, the balanced position will no doubt fall squarely within the envelope of the person “who is best placed to accept and mitigate the risk” taking that risk.
We have started reviewing existing PPAs to ascertain how the NEG will impact on the existing pricing arrangements, and are giving consideration to appropriate provisions for new PPAs. Please contact a member of our Energy team if you would like further assistance.
Publication
Artificial intelligence (AI) raises many intellectual property (IP) issues.
Publication
We are delighted to announce that Al Hounsell, Director of Strategic Innovation & Legal Design based in our Toronto office, has been named 'Innovative Leader of the Year' at the International Legal Technology Association (ILTA) Awards.
Publication
On 6 September 2022, the European Commission (EC) prohibited Illumina’s acquisition of Grail, bringing to an end the administrative stage of a legal saga that has attracted interest beyond competition law specialists.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023