
Publication
How the new Building Canada Act works
On June 26, Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, received royal assent. The One Canadian Economy Act introduces two pieces of legislation aimed at bolstering economic development in Canada.
Global | Publication | April 2018
The US Food and Drug Administration does not have much of a sense of humor when it comes to the mandatory ingredient list on packaged food products. Last month, the FDA issued a Warning Letter to the Nashoba Brook Bakery in Concord, Massachusetts, for, among other violations, listing “love” as an ingredient in its granola and whole wheat bread, in violation of 21 C.F.R. § 101.4(a)(1), which requires the label or labelling of a food to display a list of ingredients, “listed by common or usual name in descending order of predominance by weight on either the principal display panel or the information panel.” According to the FDA:
“‘Love’ is not a common or usual name of an ingredient, and is considered to be intervening material because it is not part of the common or usual name of the ingredient.”
Accordingly, it concluded that the products were misbranded under 21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2), which sets forth the ingredient listing requirement.
It does not appear, however, that the FDA targeted this bakery solely for its creative labelling: an FDA inspection earlier this year found numerous serious violations of the Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations, including failure to clean and sanitize equipment, staff wearing jewelry while working in direct contact with food, and “[o]ne approximately one inch long crawling insect underneath exposed ready-to-eat foods in the pastry area,” as well as other labelling violations. After being issued a listing of the FDA’s inspectional observations (FDA Form 483), the bakery provided no formal response to the FDA, triggering the Warning Letter.
This case serves as a warning that food companies should avoid creative license with ingredient lists, even when the reasonable consumer would clearly not expect the “ingredient”—in this case, love—to be in the product.
Publication
On June 26, Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, received royal assent. The One Canadian Economy Act introduces two pieces of legislation aimed at bolstering economic development in Canada.
Publication
In this edition we report on the Law Commission’s interim statement on 1954 Act reform following its two November consultations. We then examine the facts, judgments and implications of 3 recent cases: Emily Colville comments on the progress of a case determining whether or not a roof top garden should be considered a “storey” for the purposes of the Building Safety Act 2022.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025