
Publication
Canadian employment and labour quarterly
This newsletter will keep employers up to date on Canadian employment and labour developments and best practices.
Author:
Global | Publication | August 2017
George Bundy Smith: A great man-my co-author, former law partner and friend-passed away on Aug. 5, 2017. A man of incredible conviction and moral character, he served as a role model and mentor to so many. His actions and example left the world a far better place. He will be sorely missed.
When a plaintiff shareholder is successful in a derivative lawsuit brought on behalf of a corporation, New York Business Corporation Law §626(e) provides courts with the discretion to award reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, as reimbursement for those incurred in bringing the action on the corporation’s behalf. Success in such an action is measured by whether plaintiff achieved a "substantial benefit" for the corporation or its shareholders, but a substantial benefit alone will not entitle a plaintiff to reimbursement. Section 626 imposes other requirements that must be met to recover attorney fees, including that the plaintiff be a shareholder both at the time of the issue as well as commencement of the suit, and that such plaintiff make and plead with particularity a pre-suit demand upon the corporation or the circumstances why such a demand would have been futile.
This column addresses recent Commercial Division decisions evaluating claims for awards of expenses and attorney fees, pursuant to §626(e).
Business Corporation Law §626 governs when a plaintiff is authorized to bring a derivative action on behalf of a domestic or foreign corporation. To do so, the plaintiff must be a shareholder of the corporation both at the time of the transaction complained of and when the suit was commenced. The plaintiff is required to plead with particularity her pre-suit demand upon the corporation’s board of directors or the reasons why such a demand would be futile. A shareholder derivative action cannot be discontinued, compromised or settled without court approval.
Section 626 also authorizes a court to award expenses, including attorney fees, to a successful plaintiff:
If [a derivative] action on behalf of the corporation is successful, in whole or in part, or if anything was received by the plaintiff or plaintiffs or a claimant or claimants as the result of a judgment, compromise, or settlement of an action or claim, the court may award the plaintiff or plaintiffs, claimant or claimants, reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, and shall direct him or them to account to the corporation for the remainder of the proceeds so received by him or them. This paragraph shall not apply to any judgment rendered for the benefit of injured shareholders only and limited to a recovery of the loss or damage sustained by them.
Read the full article: Attorney fee awards in shareholder derivative actions
Publication
This newsletter will keep employers up to date on Canadian employment and labour developments and best practices.
Publication
In this edition we provide a reminder of the main provisions and implications of the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025 since its Royal Assent, and discuss the potential for a long-awaited strategic shift for infrastructure projects following the formation of the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority. We also discuss the outcome and significance of an interesting court of appeal case considering boundary agreements and provide an update on recent tax events affecting the real estate sector.
Publication
Te Board of Directors of Pemex approved the Guidelines for Mixed Development Schemes of the Public State Company, Petróleos Mexicanos (Agreement CA-025/2025, the “Guidelines”), published in the Federal Official Gazette (DOF) on April 29, 2025.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025