New legislation has commenced in NSW requiring all local councils in the Sydney area1 to establish local planning panels for their local government areas by March 2018 (Planning Panels Act).2 This update provides further details about these changes and the timing of their implementation.
Mandatory local planning panels are being introduced to "bring expertise, transparency and integrity"3 to the assessment of development applications (DAs) at a local level. Independent expert panels have been used for several years by some councils, for example, Wollongong, Sutherland and Lane Cove Councils. Liverpool Council is a particular example where its independent expert panel has been operating since 1997.4
Under the new provisions, where a local planning panel has been constituted, councillors cannot exercise any consent authority functions. This includes, for example, determining a DA or modification to a DA. Instead, those functions sit with either the local planning panel, a delegated council officer or the joint regional planning panel (JRPP). In addition, the Minister for Planning (Minister) can direct local councils (through section 117 directions) as to which DAs are to be determined by an local planning panel, other than those DAs that already sit with a JRPP.
It is proposed that the local planning panels will be comprised of three independent persons:
- an independent chair, with relevant expertise that includes law or government and public administration, approved by the Minister;
- two other independent persons with relevant expertise,5 approved by the Minister; and
- a representative of the local community who is not a councillor or mayor.6
The Minister for Planning, Anthony Roberts, said that the local planning panels would establish "a transparent and accountable process in place when assessing DAs of significant value, where there is a conflict of interest for the council or developer, or when they are of a sensitive nature".
Although some argue that local planning panels will strip local councils of their decision making powers from elected councillors, others in the development industry have welcomed the panels. For example, the Urban Taskforce agrees that the compulsory establishment of local planning panels will "ensure a level playing field for everyone. Having a central pool of experts will also ensure effective use of resources and that all panel members will have up to date knowledge of the planning rules".7
Councils are not required to have their local planning panels in place until 1 March 2018.8 Until a local planning panel is in place, councillors can still exercise consent authority functions such as approving DAs.
Changes to JRPP
The Planning Panels Act also introduces changes to JRPPs, which have not yet commenced. Schedule 4A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 sets out the classes of development which are to be determined by a JRPP. This is to be repealed and replaced by Schedule 7 of State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011. This will mean that the JRPP development thresholds can be changed without an act of NSW Parliament.
The primary changes are:
- the threshold for general development has been increased from a capital investment value (CIV) threshold of more than $20 million to a threshold of more than $30 million; and
- previously, an applicant could request that development with a CIV of more than $10 million but less than $20 million which had not been determined by a local council within 120 days be determined by the JRPP. This upper threshold of $20 million has been increased to $30 million.
Staged DA update
In July 2017, we reported on the case of Bay Simmer Investments Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales  NSWCA 135 regarding staged development applications.
In that case, the NSW Court of Appeal declared a staged development consent invalid on the basis that:
- construction impacts should be and were not considered at the concept proposal stage, despite the concept proposal not approving construction; and
- it could not properly be considered a staged DA, because it related only to a concept proposal, and did not include a detailed proposal for a separate part of the site. To be a staged DA, the initial concept proposal must be followed by at least two detailed DAs, each for separate parts of the site.
That decision prompted the NSW Department of Planning and Environment to release a draft bill which allows development impacts to be considered at the 'Stage 2' development consent phase, rather than the concept approval stage, and enables a concept only DA to be followed by a single DA for construction. The draft bill was passed through NSW Parliament on 8 August 2017 without amendment and has now commenced.
Please contact a member of our environment and planning team for more information.
The Sydney area comprises the Greater Sydney Region and City of Wollongong (see s23J(2), Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979). The 'Greater Sydney Region' is defined in Schedule 1 of the Greater Sydney Commission Act 2015 and includes all local council areas up to the boundaries of Pittwater, Hornsby, Hawkesbury, Blue Mountains, Wollondilly, Campbelltown and Sutherland.
Environmental Planning and Assessment and Electoral Legislation Amendment (Planning Panels and Enforcement) Act 2017.
Ministerial Media Release: The Hon. Anthony Roberts, IHAPs to be introduced for all Sydney councils (8 August 2017) NSW Department of Planning and Environment
Susan Thompson and Paul Maginn, Planning Australia: An Overview of Urban and Regional Planning (Cambridge University Press, 2nd Ed, 2012) 49.
Relevant expertise means planning, architecture, heritage, the environment, urban design, economics, traffic and transport, law, engineering, tourism or government and public administration – see Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s23K(7).
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s23K.
The Urban Developer, Councils Stripped of DA Powers in NSW (10 August 2017)
See clause 150 of Schedule 6, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
How will latest changes to Volcker Rule affect non-US banks?
Kathleen A. Scott discusses the final Volcker Rule, focusing on some of the issues raised by non-US banks in their comments.