Publication
Infringement risk relating to creation and use of the output of a generative AI system
Where the Output of a generative AI system is the same or substantially similar to a third party’s copyright work
California employment law wrap-up: The top five developments for California employers in July 2021
United States | Publication | August 4, 2021
Employers triumph in two noteworthy wage-hour cases, while the state Supreme Court takes a broad view of the statute of limitations under state discrimination laws. Read below for our brief summary of these and other developments for July 2021.
- California Supreme Court clarifies statute of limitations for FEHA claims
- Court of appeals finds that employer’s compensation program does not violate California’s distinctive “no wage borrowing” rule
- California court of appeals clarifies how the overtime rate can be listed on employees’ wage statements
- The NLRB rules that solicitation of mail ballots is objectionable conduct in a board election
- Missed break periods must be paid at overtime rates
That's a wrap. See you next month for another top five developments for California employers.
Recent publications
Publication
Is the output of the generative AI system protected by intellectual property rights?
The approach and requirements for intellectual property rights to subsist in computer-generated works vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
Publication
Infringement risk relating to training a generative AI system
Generative AI systems are trained using vast amounts of data, often taken from sources in the public domain that may be protected by copyright or other intellectual property rights, such as, in the UK and EU, a database right.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .