Introduction
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) considerations have been on the radar of occupational pension scheme trustees for many years.
Following recent changes to the legislative framework for trust-based pension schemes, it is now clear that the incorporation of ESG factors and stewardship approaches (e.g. how trustees engage with their investments) should be a key component in the investment decision-making of trustees.
ESG factors are not static and encompass a wide range of considerations which trustees could take into account in their investment decisions. Some examples include
Environmental |
|
Social |
|
Governance |
|
Climate change |
Community relations |
Board composition |
Waste and recycling |
Employee relations |
Executive Remuneration |
Supply chain management |
Health and safety |
Bribery and corruption |
Carbon emissions |
Human Rights |
Shareholder rights |
Energy usage |
Gender and diversity |
Audit committee structures |
|
|
|
Despite the legislative changes, a February 2020 report by the UK Sustainable Finance and Investment Association (UKSIF) found that a change in attitudes may not yet have occurred amongst many pension scheme trustees and some schemes remain at the start of their ESG journey. The report found that many trust-based defined contribution schemes had ESG investment policies which were vague and non-committal and two-thirds of schemes had failed to comply with the minimum legal requirement to publish their Statement of Investment Principles (SIP). Such non-compliance places trustees at risk of breaching their fiduciary and regulatory duties.
The coronavirus pandemic is also likely to push ESG concerns further up the agenda of pension scheme trustees. In particular the Social, and Governance elements, which have to date received less attention than Environmental considerations may receive more prominence as the sustainability of companies with good structures in place to help them survive the fall-out from COVID-19 becomes more evident.
This briefing aims to set out the ESG-based requirements which are currently in place in order to assist trustees in assessing their compliance to date and to provide a practical guide to the next steps which trustees should be taking in preparation for the additional requirements which are coming in to force later this year and beyond.
Evolution of ESG in the SIP
The Occupational Pension Schemes (Investment) Regulations 2005 (the Investment Regulations) have long required trustees to include in their SIP their policy in relation to “the extent (if at all) to which social, environmental or ethical considerations are taken into account in the selection, retention and realisation of investments”. However, due to historic confusion about the ability and extent to which trustees should take ESG into account in their investment decisions, ESG has traditionally been viewed by many pension scheme trustees as an ‘optional extra’ or a nice-to-have luxury.
To address this apparent inertia, the Government has commissioned various reports in the last few years to identify any legal obstacles which would prevent pension trustees from taking account of ESG type factors in their investment processes. In particular, it appeared that many trustees remained under a mistaken belief that the case of Cowan v Scargill [1985] meant that taking account of ESG factors and/or considering social impact investments would run contrary to the long-established principle that trustees must only invest in the best financial interests of members.
However, the Law Commission found that the key is to understand that ESG factors are financial factors in their own right as they can affect risks and returns in the investment strategy, both of which impact the financial interests of members. Accordingly, the Investment Regulations were amended in 2018 and 2019 to introduce revised obligations dealing with trustees’ ESG policies and their stewardship and dealings with their asset managers.
Where are we now?
By October 1, 2019 trustees were required to include in their SIP their policies on:
- The duty to take into account financially material considerations over the appropriate time horizon. ‘Financially material considerations’ expressly include ESG issues including climate change. The ‘appropriate time horizon’ means the length of time which trustees consider is required for the funding of future benefits by the investments of the scheme.
- Their stewardship obligations – this encompasses how rights relating to scheme investments (including voting rights) are exercised.
- Their approach to non-financial matters – this means the extent to which (if at all) non-financial matters play a role when trustees are deciding whether to select, retain or realise scheme investments. ‘Non-financial matters’ include the ethical views of members and beneficiaries, their views in relation to social and environmental impacts and their views on the present and future quality of life of the members and beneficiaries of the scheme.
By October 1, 2020 trustees will need to include further detail in their SIPs on their stewardship policy and arrangements with asset managers. Prior to that date, the SIP must be expanded to cover:
- How their arrangements with their asset managers incentivise the manager to align its investment strategy and decisions with the trustees’ investment policies.
- How their arrangements with the asset managers incentivise them to assess and make decisions based on the medium to long-term financial and non-financial performance of an issuer of debt and equity and to engage with the issuer to improve this medium-long term performance.
- How the method and time horizon of the evaluation of the asset manager’s performance as well as the manager’s remuneration is aligned with the trustees investment policies.
- An updated stewardship policy which deals with how they engage with and monitor investee companies in terms of their capital structure and how actual or potential conflicts of interest are managed.
- How they monitor the portfolio turnover costs incurred by the asset manager.
- The duration of their arrangement with the asset manager.
From October 2020 trustees who are required to produce a SIP will also need to produce an implementation statement - we discuss this in the second part of our briefing below.
Key ESG dates for your diary
By October 1, 2019 |
By October 1, 2020 |
From October 1, 2020 |
By October 1, 2021 |
Trustees of DB and DC
/ Hybrid schemes1
should have included
in their SIP their policy
on how financially mater
ial considerations
including, but not limited
to, ESG factors are
taken into account in
trustee investment
decisions; the extent (if
at all) non-financial
matters such as
member views are
taken into account in
trustee investment
decisions; and to reflect
their stewardship policy
(e.g. how rights relating
to investments
(including voting rights)
are exercised)
DC / Hybrid schemes
were also
required to ensure the
SIP for the default
arrangements also
covers the above
matters
DC / Hybrid schemes
must have published
the scheme's SIP on a
publicly available free to
access website
|
Trustees of DC / Hybrid
schemes and DB
schemes must update
their SIP to include
additional details on
their arrangements with
the scheme’s asset
managers
DB schemes must
publish the scheme's
SIP on a publicly
available, free to access
website
|
Trustees of DC / Hybrid
schemes and DB
schemes must include
an Implementation
Statement in their first
Annual Report
published after October
1, 2020. This must also
then be published
online free of charge. |
DC / Hybrid Schemes
must publish their first
implementation
statement online by this
date at the latest
DB Schemes must
publish their
implementation
statement free of
charge on a website
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation Statements – a practical guide
What is an Implementation Statement?
Alongside the obligation to formally formulate their policies on
ESG integration, from October 2020 trustees will be required
to include an implementation statement when they publish
their scheme’s annual report. The Pensions Regulator intends
that this statement will be a way of ensuring that action follows
intent as far as possible by requiring trustees to set out how
they have followed and acted upon the investment principles
and policies contained in their SIP during the scheme year. The
fact that the implementation statement will be publicly available
means trustees will have to focus on how their policies and
arrangements have delivered against the agreed principles and
rely on their asset managers and consultants to equip them
with the relevant information to demonstrate compliance.
When will an Implementation Statement be
required?
Trustees will need to include an implementation statement
when they publish their first annual accounts after October
1, 2020. Each subsequent annual report will also need to
include an implementation statement. The deadline for the first
implementation statement will therefore depend on when trustees
produce their annual report. This is subject to a final deadline
of October 1, 2021 for the publication of the first implementation
statement for both DC / Hybrid and DB schemes.
Although some schemes may still have some time before their
first implementation statement is required there are a number
of steps which trustees should be taking now to ensure they
are prepared to comply with the implementation statement
requirements when the time comes.
What goes in an Implementation Statement?
Although the exact information contained in the implementation
statement will differ depending on whether your scheme is a
DC / Hybrid scheme or a DB scheme and depending on the
individual circumstances of your scheme there are some broad
principles which the legislation requires trustees to cover as
described in the table below.
It should be noted that if the scheme does provide both DB and DC benefits, the DC / Hybrid requirements apply to the whole scheme even if the DB and DC benefits are run as segregated sections. Hybrid schemes must therefore report on the implementation of their DB investment policies as well as their DC policies.
Non-compliance with the legislative requirements, is subject to discretionary penalties under s168 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 and Regulation 5 of the Disclosure Regulations.
DC / Hybrid Schemes |
DB Schemes |
- Trustees should describe how and the extent to which
in their opinion, they have followed the SIP during the
scheme year.
- Trustees should detail any changes made to the SIP
during the scheme year and the reasons for these
changes.
- Trustees should describe any review of the SIP
undertaken in compliance with Regulation 2(1) of the
Investment Regulations and / or any other review of the
SIP undertaken during the scheme year.2
- Where no review has been carried out in accordance with
Regulation 2(1) the trustees should include the last date
that such a review took place.
- Trustees are also required to include a description of
voting behaviour by or on behalf of the trustees (including
the most significant votes cast by or on behalf of the
trustees).3
- Trustees also need to state any use of a proxy voter
during the scheme year.4
|
- Trustees should include a description of voting behaviour
by or on behalf of the trustees (including the most
significant votes cast by or on behalf of the trustees).
- Trustees also need to state any use of a proxy voter
during the scheme year.
- Trustees will need to describe the extent to which they
have followed the policies in their SIP on the exercise of
rights attaching to investments (including voting rights).
- Trustees will also need to describe the extent to
which they have followed the policies in their SIP on
undertaking engagement activities including monitoring
and engaging with investment managers.
|
|
|
The Pensions Regulator’s DC investment guidance has now
been updated to provide some further ideas on what trustees
may look to include in their implementation statements. The DB
investment guidance has not yet been updated however the
DC guidance may also be useful to trustees of DB schemes as
an illustration of the Pensions Regulator’s current thinking on
implementation statements.
The DC guidance states that the implementation statement
might include detail on the following:
- How trustees have developed their policies on voting and
engagement, including the relevance of investment beliefs
underpinning those policies and their investment time
horizons.
- The time and resources trustees have dedicated to the
process, including details of any relevant sub-committees
and advice taken.
- How the trustees’ policies have been implemented in
practice (e.g. actions taken with investor coalitions,
reviewing investment manager mandates and public policy
work undertaken).
The February 2020 UKSIF report
did recommend that the Pensions Regulator provides more
detailed guidance on what should feature in the implementation
statement however this is not expected at present.
PLSA guidance
In addition to the legislative requirements and minimal guidance from the Pensions Regulator set out above, on 31 July 2020, the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) also released its Implementation Statement Guidance. The PLSA worked together with industry participants to devise this practical guidance which is designed to assist trustees in producing the new implementation statement and co-ordinate the necessary conversations with their asset managers and other professional advisers.
This guidance follows on from the PLSA’s 2019 guidance on the first phase of the changes and includes a step-by-step process in both planning and producing the implementation statement to assist trustees in identifying and actioning the key milestones on the journey to publication of the statement.
The PLSA recognises that implementation statements are new for both trustees and their advisers and this guidance is designed to help trustees get to grips with what the legislation requires and when. In addition, the PLSA sets out some high-level general principles on the content of the implementation statement and some more detailed questions for trustees to consider when deciding on the disclosures which will feature in the implementation statement. The guidance also contains specific consideration of how to deal with voting behaviour disclosures in the implementation statement and concludes with some more general tips on investment communication.
The PLSA intends that this guidance should assist trustees in getting the disclosures in the implementation statement correct so that they are meaningful, relevant and focus on significant, ‘move the dial’ information which has had a material impact on investment outcomes and decisions. The guidance is also intended to assist trustees in fully considering the time and resources needed to complete the first implementation statement in good time and will evolve over time as market practice develops.
Publishing the Implementation Statement
Defined contribution and hybrid pension schemes will be
required to publish their first implementation statement online
free of charge at the earlier of:
- The signing of their first annual report after October 1,
2020.
- By October 1, 2021.
Defined benefit schemes will also be required to publish their
implementation statement online by October 1, 2021.
What should Trustees be doing now?
Trustees should also ensure that they are familiar with the
intentions and objectives contained in their SIP and what
these commitments mean in practice so that they are able to
evidence and explain these when writing their implementation
statement.
In order to prepare, trustees should ensure that their managers
are providing them with the information which they will need to
complete the implementation statement. Although the majority
of trustees will not have the experience, expertise or regulatory
authorisation to take the necessary steps to integrate ESG into
their portfolios, the legal responsibility to ensure that ESG and
stewardship are properly integrated rests with the trustees – it
is not sufficient for trustees to totally delegate these matters
to their investment managers. Instead trustees should work
together with their managers to ensure appropriate integration
of ESG and stewardship matters. The PLSA recommends some
key procedural steps which trustees should be embarking on to
manage their new ESG responsibilities.
Key Tips for Trustees
- You should recognise that you will need to take a more
active role in considering ESG as a factor in investment
decisions and should carefully consider the responsibilities
which you are delegating to asset managers.
- If you have not already done so, you should ensure you
understand how ESG is already incorporated within your
scheme’s investment portfolio. You should ask your asset
managers which ESG risks it considers financially material
to your portfolio and why.
- You should ensure the Trustee Board undertakes some
training on ESG investing and climate change.
- When delegating to an asset manager ensure, that you
have asked questions around and considered their ESG
capabilities and reporting framework.
- You should check the contents of any Investment
Management Agreements to see if ESG requirements
should be added to the mandate.
- If you have not yet done so, sit down with your asset
managers to consider their ESG capabilities and how your
investment beliefs can be realistically put into practice.
- You should also question your asset managers about their
approach to ESG investing and the data and tools which
they use to integrate ESG and meaningfully consider ESG
factors including their voting approach and their ability to
influence companies.
- You should be prepared to challenge advisers on how they
will use trustee investment beliefs in how they incorporate
and report ESG activity.
- You should discuss a reporting process on ESG with your
asset managers to ensure that you are able to communicate
on how ESG has been implemented and that regular
meetings can be scheduled.
- Ensure that you keep up to date with industry best practice
guidance and consultations.
- Consider engaging with your asset managers to periodically
review your SIP to ensure that it matches your evolving
investment beliefs and any changes in market practice.
What Next?
It is clear that the importance of ESG and stewardship
considerations has grown considerably in recent years and that
these factors should now be an important topic on a pension
scheme’s agenda. Many schemes remain near the beginning of
their ESG journey and recent indications are that this journey
still has a long way to go.
In addition to the enhanced statutory requirements which
will apply from October 2020 which trustees will need to be
prepared for, they should also be mindful that the Government’s
gaze appears firmly fixed on requiring pension scheme trustees
to address climate change.
Pensions Minister Guy Opperman has expressed a commitment
to ensuring that pension scheme trustees act on climate
change and as well as consulting on requirements on all large
asset owners (including pension schemes) to make disclosures
in-line with recommendations of the Taskforce on Climaterelated
Financial Disclosures (TCFD) by 2022,5 the Pension
Schemes Bill currently progressing through parliament had
an amendment tabled which, if included in the final legislation
would give the Government broad reserved powers to
introduce enhanced climate change governance responsibilities
and reporting requirements for trustees as well as giving related
enforcement powers to the Pensions Regulator.
It is therefore clear that the regulatory direction of travel for ESG
and climate change related issues is moving towards increased
governance and forcing stakeholders such as pension scheme
trustees to take steps to adopt an ESG-integrated mindset.
As trustees start to focus on putting together their first
implementation statements, this momentum will only accelerate
and push ESG considerations higher up the agenda. What is
undeniably clear is that trustees are at the beginning of a new
regulatory regime, which will likely need a mindset shift and
detailed support from their investment managers, consultants
and legal advisers to navigate the challenges ahead.
We have put together the brief skeleton checklist below for
trustees to use as a final takeaway reminder of the key dates for
their ESG / Stewardship diary.
ESG Checklist
Requirement |
Deadline |
Scheme Type |
Completed? |
Update SIP with ESG and Stewardship policies |
October 1, 2019 |
DB and DC / Hybrid Schemes |
|
Publish SIP on a freely available website |
October 1, 2019 |
DC / Hybrid Schemes |
|
Update SIP to include policies on arrangements with asset managers |
October 1, 2020 |
DC / Hybrid Schemes |
|
Publish SIP on freely available website |
October 1, 2020 |
DB Schemes |
|
Implementation Statement must be included in next annual report setting out how the SIP has been followed during the scheme year.
Publish this on a freely available website
|
First annual report from October 1, 2020.
No later than October 1, 2021
|
DC / Hybrid Schemes |
|
Published Implementation Statement must also now include a description of the voting behaviour by or on behalf of the trustees including the use of proxies. |
October 1, 2021 |
DC / Hybrid
Schemes |
|
Implementation Statement containing information on Stewardship policy and trustee voting behaviour must be included in next annual report and must be published on a freely available website |
First annual report from October 1, 2020.
No later than October 1, 2021
|
DB Schemes |
|
|
|
|
|