
Publication
WHS Law Briefing
Welcome to our WHS Law Briefing. This briefing identifies key issues and emerging trends in WHS Law, and details significant legislative and case law developments from February to date in July 2025.
Canada | Publication | May 12, 2025
Canadian securities regulators have made changes to give investors greater access to exempt markets.
On April 17, 2025, the securities commissions of Alberta, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec and Saskatchewan each issued, as part of a coordinated effort, a blanket order (collectively, the blanket orders) amending one of the investment limits under the offering memorandum exemption (the OM exemption) contained in National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus Exemptions (NI 45-106). The blanket orders are referred to as Coordinated Blanket Order 45-933 – Exemption from the Investment Limit under the Offering Memorandum Prospectus Exemption to Exclude Reinvestment Amounts.
Under the OM exemption, investment limits apply to investments by individuals. Particularly, the acquisition cost of all securities acquired in an issuer pursuant to the OM exemption in the preceding 12 months may not exceed the following amounts:
These investment limits were intended to strike a balance between investor protection and facilitating investments in the exempt market.
The blanket orders amend the investment limits by providing that proceeds of disposition reinvested by an eligible investor in the same issuer do not count towards the 12-month $100,000 investment limit, provided the reinvested amount does not exceed $100,000.
To rely on the blanket orders, the eligible investor must have received advice from “a portfolio manager, investment dealer or exempt market dealer” that both the reinvestment amount and any new investment made under the OM exemption are suitable for the investor. This allows eligible investors to reinvest returns up to a maximum of $100,000 and participate in greater financing opportunities without being constrained by the $100,000 investment limit set out in NI 45-106.
An issuer relying on a blanket order in either Ontario or Nova Scotia must give written notice to the relevant securities commission within 10 days of completing the securities distribution.
We agree with the objectives sought by regulators and recommendation by the Capital Markets Modernization Taskforce: to facilitate capital-raising opportunities for issuers and allow investors to participate in more exempt market opportunities. The blanket orders allow investors to keep their capital invested in the exempt market. This is an important step towards greater access to exempt markets while maintaining the regulators’ mandate of investor protection.
The blanket orders may be useful to investors in the following circumstances:
However, the blanket orders’ effectiveness in facilitating greater investment into or keeping investments in the exempt markets through the OM exemption may be muted for the following reasons:
While the blanket orders expand reinvestment potential, we encourage regulators to continue to consider ways to expand access to exempt market opportunities, for example, by:
The blanket orders took effect on April 17, 2025, and remain effective in each jurisdiction until the date set out in the respective blanket order unless extended.
The authors would like to thank Elizabeth Pierman, articling student, for her contribution to preparing this legal update.
Publication
Welcome to our WHS Law Briefing. This briefing identifies key issues and emerging trends in WHS Law, and details significant legislative and case law developments from February to date in July 2025.
Publication
.On 25 July 2025 the FCA published Primary Market Bulletin 57 (PMB 57) in which it finalises certain changes to the Knowledge Base, consults on further amendments, and highlights upcoming changes to the National Storage Mechanism and certain UK MAR notification forms.
Publication
In Roberts Co (NSW) Pty Ltd v Sharvain Facades Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2025] NSWCA 161, the NSW Court of Appeal has found that, for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (SoP Act), a deeming clause providing that a notice given after 5pm is to be treated as having been given and received at 9am on the next business day, does not extend the statutory time period for service of a payment schedule.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025