Blockchain transactions are often said to be anonymous or at least pseudonymous—but are they really? At least for some users, part of the appeal of using cryptocurrency is the perceived anonymity it seemingly offers. But increasingly, judicial decisions and governmental enforcement activity show that this perception is mistaken.
A burgeoning industry of blockchain analysis tools now enables governments and litigants to analyze cryptocurrency transactions on the blockchain and in many cases trace them back to an identifiable, real-world user, even where such users have taken steps to conceal their identity. Recent developments show how courts and enforcers have embraced using this technology.
Robert A. Schwinger explores recent developments in this edition of his New York Law Journal Blockchain law column.
Download the full New York Law Journal article, "Anonymous no more: Blockchain analytics in the courts."
Publication
On 3 July 2025 the UK Takeover Panel (Panel) published PCP 2025/1: Dual class share structures, IPOs and share buybacks (Consultation) setting out a proposed framework for the application of the UK Takeover Code (Code) to companies with dual class share structures (DCSS companies).
Publication
In Sapura Fabrication Sdn Bhd and others v GAS and anor appeal [2025] SGCA 13, the Singapore Court of Appeal made important findings
Publication
Recent announcements by the Canadian federal government to invest billions of dollars to modernize the Canadian Armed Forces, build a self-sufficient domestic defence and security industrial base, and reduce reliance on the United States for defence capabilities signal Canada’s renewed commitment to national defence and security and a diversification of its strategic alliances.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025