Publication
Infringement risk relating to creation and use of the output of a generative AI system
Where the Output of a generative AI system is the same or substantially similar to a third party’s copyright work
Pensions Regulator blogs on its scam prevention work
United Kingdom | Publication | February 2025
The Regulator has published a blog on its mission to ensure the protection of savers' money from pension scams.
Written by Paul Sweeney, Pension Scams Action Group Intelligence Business Lead, the blog sets out how the Regulator is “significantly boosting” its own intelligence on scams and working more closely with its partners to “stay one step ahead of scammers”.
The blog examines the Regulator’s role in leading the Pension Scams Action Group to deliver on its mission to prevent and disrupt pension scams, with intelligence experts from the Regulator being embedded within critical agencies, including the City of London Police and the National Economic Crime Centre. Mr Sweeney writes: “By enhancing the national intelligence picture, we can support effective policy making and decisive, cost-effective action”.
Partner
Email
lesley.browning@nortonrosefulbright.com
Recent publications
Publication
Is the output of the generative AI system protected by intellectual property rights?
The approach and requirements for intellectual property rights to subsist in computer-generated works vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
Publication
Infringement risk relating to training a generative AI system
Generative AI systems are trained using vast amounts of data, often taken from sources in the public domain that may be protected by copyright or other intellectual property rights, such as, in the UK and EU, a database right.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .