Publication
Infringement risk relating to creation and use of the output of a generative AI system
Where the Output of a generative AI system is the same or substantially similar to a third party’s copyright work
Over the course of 2019 and first half of 2020, there have been a number of significant developments in Canadian law relating to Indigenous people and their rights and interests in lands.
This publication summarizes a number of key decisions dealing with:
- the evolving case law on the duty to consult on projects and decision-making;
- granting or dismissing injunctions in the context of project development and blockades;
- procedural issues affecting ongoing litigation in this area; and
- section 35 rights treaty and Aboriginal rights.
For more information on any of these cases or other Indigenous law issues, please contact any member of Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP’s Indigenous law team.
Senior Partner, Canadian Co-Head of Responsible Business and Sustainability
Email
ray.chartier@nortonrosefulbright.com
Recent publications
Publication
Is the output of the generative AI system protected by intellectual property rights?
The approach and requirements for intellectual property rights to subsist in computer-generated works vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
Publication
Infringement risk relating to training a generative AI system
Generative AI systems are trained using vast amounts of data, often taken from sources in the public domain that may be protected by copyright or other intellectual property rights, such as, in the UK and EU, a database right.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .