
Publication
WHS Law Briefing
Welcome to our WHS Law Briefing. This briefing identifies key issues and emerging trends in WHS Law, and details significant legislative and case law developments from February to date in July 2025.
Author:
Canada | Publication | June 25, 2025
In February 2025, we informed you in a previous legal update of the government's intention to grant itself special powers in the event of a labour dispute, as part of Bill 89, An Act to give greater consideration to the needs of the population in the event of a strike or lock-out (the Act).
Introduced by Labour Minister Jean Boulet (the Minister), this Act was passed on May 30.
This legal update summarizes the main changes that will come into effect on November 30, 2025.
To alleviate the inconvenience caused to the public by the increasing number of work stoppages in major sectors of society, the Act requires the maintenance of certain “services ensuring the well-being of the population” during strikes or lock-outs. It is therefore a new system in addition to the “essential services” provided for in the Labour Code (the Code) since 1982. This new concept is defined as follows:
“services ensuring the well-being of the population”: the services minimally required to prevent the population’s social, economic or environmental security from being disproportionately affected, in particular that of persons in vulnerable situations.1
To illustrate the scope of the concept of “persons in vulnerable situations,” the Minister cited recent labour disputes in the educational services for children with special needs and funeral services sectors. However, this definition is not limited to protecting these persons: the concept of “services ensuring the well-being of the population” could thus be interpreted more broadly.
This new section, to be introduced in November 2025, does not apply to government departments or government agencies, or institutions covered under the Act respecting the process of negotiation of collective agreements in the public and parapublic sectors.2
The new system will operate in stages:
It is important to note that the strike or lock-out continues despite the Tribunal’s decision to require the parties to maintain services ensuring the well-being of the public, until a decision or agreement is reached on the terms and conditions of the services to be maintained. However, if justified by exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal may suspend the right to strike or lock out once it has decided on the services to be maintained.10
The new provisions of the Code prohibit any non-compliance with a Tribunal ruling or an agreement. The Tribunal will also be able to investigate when a labour dispute jeopardizes the proper delivery of services ensuring the well-being of the public.
The Act also provides that the Minister may now end a labour dispute by referring it to an arbitrator to determine the conditions of employment of the employees concerned.11 This exceptional intervention by the Minister is, however, subject to two (2) conditions: the strike or lock-out must cause or threaten to cause serious or irreparable harm to the public, and mediation or conciliation efforts have not been successful.
Once this power has been exercised, the strike or lock-out will end at the date and time specified by the Minister, and the employer must ensure that conditions of employment are maintained, as provided for in section 59 of the Code.12 The parties will have 10 days to select an arbitrator and, failing agreement, the Minister will appoint the arbitrator ex officio.13
The public and parapublic sectors, as defined by the Code, are notably exempt from the application of this special power.14
This new exceptional power conferred on the Minister is reminiscent of that granted to their federal counterparts under section 107 of the Canada Labour Code. However, it remains more limited. The Canada Labour Code allows the federal minister, where the minister deems it expedient, to do such things as the minister deems likely to maintain or secure industrial peace, including referring any question to the Canada Industrial Relations Board or directing the board to do such things as the minister deems necessary.
Restriction of the right to lock out: The Act also has the effect of harmonizing certain provisions of the Code relating to exercising the right to strike in public services, to make them also applicable to lock out.15 Previously, the sections concerned only covered the right of certified associations to strike. From now on, lock-outs will be treated in the same way as strikes involving public services subject to the maintenance of services: notice of at least seven (7) working days must be given to the certified association and the Minister.
Priority treatment before the Tribunal: Lastly, the Act also provides that matters involving essential services or services ensuring the well-being of the public will be heard and decided as a matter of priority by the Tribunal.16
The Act’s coming into force will mark a major change in the framework for labour disputes in Quebec. Employers will now have to deal with an expanded system for maintaining services, including those “ensuring the well-being of the population,” and will be required to negotiate promptly with unions on the services to be maintained, under the Tribunal’s supervision.
The Act also gives the Minister exceptional power to end a dispute by imposing binding arbitration of the conditions of employment, without the parties’ consent. This mechanism, based on the federal system, significantly alters the balance of collective bargaining. However, the notion of “serious or irreparable injury to the population,” which conditions the exercise of this power, remains vague and will have to be clarified by the courts.
Several unions have already announced their intentions to challenge these new provisions, which could lead to major legal debates. In this context, employers must remain vigilant, adapting their labour relations strategies, anticipating the potential impact of these new rules on their operations, and preparing to react quickly to changes in this new legislative framework.
The author would like to thank Thomas Iskra-Landry, student, for his contribution to preparing this legal update.
Labour Code, CQLR, c. C-27, s. 111.22.3.
Ibid., s. 111.22.3 para. 1.
Ibid., s. 111.22.4 para. 2.
Ibid., s. 111.22.6.
Ibid., s. 111.22.7 para. 1 and 3.
Ibid., s. 111.22.8 and 111.22.9.
Ibid., s. 111.22.11.
Ibid., s. 111.32.2 para. 1.
Labour Code, CQLR, c. C-27, s. 111.0.23 and 111.0.23.1.
Ibid., s. 111.22.1.
Publication
Welcome to our WHS Law Briefing. This briefing identifies key issues and emerging trends in WHS Law, and details significant legislative and case law developments from February to date in July 2025.
Publication
In Roberts Co (NSW) Pty Ltd v Sharvain Facades Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2025] NSWCA 161, the NSW Court of Appeal has found that, for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (SoP Act), a deeming clause providing that a notice given after 5pm is to be treated as having been given and received at 9am on the next business day, does not extend the statutory time period for service of a payment schedule.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025