Employers triumph in two noteworthy wage-hour cases, while the state Supreme Court takes a broad view of the statute of limitations under state discrimination laws. Read below for our brief summary of these and other developments for July 2021.

  1. California Supreme Court clarifies statute of limitations for FEHA claims
  2. Court of appeals finds that employer’s compensation program does not violate California’s distinctive “no wage borrowing” rule
  3. California court of appeals clarifies how the overtime rate can be listed on employees’ wage statements
  4. The NLRB rules that solicitation of mail ballots is objectionable conduct in a board election
  5. Missed break periods must be paid at overtime rates

That's a wrap. See you next month for another top five developments for California employers.



Practice areas:

Industries:

Recent publications

Norton Rose Fulbright | CMMI resets value-based care landscape

Publication

CMMI resets value-based care landscape

Value‑based care is entering its next phase as the Trump administration seeks accountability.

United States | November 21, 2025

Healthcare
Cryptocurrency

Publication

Blockchain law: ‘In rem’ and ‘quasi’ in rem jurisdiction in digital assets disputes

When ordinary in personam jurisdiction is not available in a dispute about digital assets, is there room for other kinds of personal jurisdiction, such as in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction?

United States | November 20, 2025

FinTech
Norton Rose Fulbright | How Nasdaq, SEC proposals may transform listing standards

Publication

How Nasdaq, SEC proposals may transform listing standards

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC filed two proposals with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

United States | November 19, 2025

Capital markets
Site search

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .

Subscribe now