
Publication
The Robinson-Patman Act revival: Five considerations for businesses
With the FTC's renewed enforcement of the RPA underway, businesses should be mindful of RPA's prohibitions on pricing discrimination.
We use cookies and other similar technology to collect data about you to allow us to deliver our online services, measure our website audience and improve your browsing experience. Full details on the cookies we use are set out in our Cookies policy. Please click OK to signify your consent to our use of cookies.
You can withdraw your consent by clicking “manage cookies” and following the instructions shown.
When can a state claim immunity from legal proceedings and enforcement of a judgment in courts that are not its own? Most legal systems recognize that, at least in some circumstances, the courts are not the appropriate forum for resolving disputes involving states. In the worst case scenario, this can leave a creditor without a remedy against a defaulting state.
We have produced a global guide to ‘State immunity’ as part of our NRF Institute, which sets out the essential information needed by financial institutions lending to, or by corporates transacting with, sovereign entities. It contains answers to the key questions presented country by country and in a comparative format.
You can use the guide to:
For state immunity advice please speak to your usual Norton Rose Fulbright contact or one of the core team members listed below.
To request access to ‘State immunity’, please register to join NRF Institute.
Registration indicates acceptance of the terms and conditions which include important information about how our product will be delivered.
Members of NRF Institute can access a range of premium content including knowledge hubs and cross-border guides.
Publication
With the FTC's renewed enforcement of the RPA underway, businesses should be mindful of RPA's prohibitions on pricing discrimination.
Publication
The Supreme Court granted petitions for certiorari in two cases, to address one of the most debated subjects in False Claims Act liability jurisprudence since the Court’s decision in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Escobar in 2016.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events...
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023