Publication
The federal government weighs in on artificial intelligence governance
Technology evolves rapidly, and artificial intelligence governance is evolving faster than ever—at times, on a daily basis.
Canada | Publication | November 2025
In November 2025, the Sanctions Bureau of Global Affairs Canada (GAC) released additional guidance on compliance with Canada’s sanctions regime. This is the first formal guidance GAC has provided since a spring 2024 update to its Frequently Asked Questions page, which we previously wrote about.
The new guidance is organized into three sections, covering:
The guidance aims to help entities understand and meet their sanctions obligations. The guidance remains high level, repeats much of GAC’s existing materials, and provides limited practical direction on how to interpret ambiguous regulatory requirements.
GAC’s additional guidance includes:
The guidance is a step in the right direction, but it does not discuss several significant compliance issues, such as the ambiguity surrounding and interpreting the “deemed ownership” provisions.
The guidance provides some insight into GAC’s position and approach. However, companies should not rely solely on the guidance. Entities should seek legal advice when interpreting sanctions legislation and implementing an adequate compliance program.
Our team of experienced sanctions and export control lawyers can help your business implement a comprehensive compliance program and conduct due diligence to meet its Canadian sanctions obligations, consistent with GAC’s guidance and applicable non-Canadian sanctions laws.
The authors would like to thank Manreet Brar, articling student, for her contribution to preparing this legal update.
Publication
Technology evolves rapidly, and artificial intelligence governance is evolving faster than ever—at times, on a daily basis.
Publication
The US DOJ has announced that the Antitrust Division has opened an investigation into major meatpacking companies for allegedly increasing prices through price-fixing and collusion, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
Publication
Following policy announcements in the federal Budget 2025, the viability of non-compete restrictive covenants (RCs) in employment agreements is once again in the spotlight. This is an opportunity to revisit the use of RCs, and possible alternatives.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025