
Publication
Not so exempt: A cautionary tale for authorised representatives
Navigating the Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) regime is not an easy task and can be costly and time consuming.
Middle East | Publication | May 2025
On 2 May 2025, the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) issued Consultation Paper No. 166 (CP166). CP166 seeks public feedback on proposed amendments to the regulatory regime governing Offers of Securities to the Public made 'from' the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) to persons outside the DIFC.
The proposals are relevant to a wide range of market participants, including Authorised Firms, Public Listed Companies, potential Offerors of securities, professional advisers, potential investors, and other industry stakeholders.
Currently, the DFSA's Markets Law requires that any Offer of Securities to the Public, whether made 'in' or 'from' the DIFC, necessitates an Approved Prospectus i.e. a Prospectus which is approved by the DFSA. An ‘Offer of Securities to the Public’ is defined as:
“a communication to any person in any form or by any means, presenting information on the terms of the offer and the Securities … offered, so as to enable an investor to decide to buy the Securities … or subscribe to those Securities…”.
Offerors (excluding those offering Units of a Fund) become Reporting Entities, subject to heightened obligations concerning corporate governance, market disclosures, financial reporting, and systems and controls. Furthermore, an Offeror making an offer 'from' the DIFC must notify the DFSA of any non-DIFC jurisdictions where the offer will be made and comply with the regulations in those jurisdictions.
The DFSA’s review of this regime was prompted by a notable increase in interest in utilising DIFC corporate structures to raise capital in markets outside the DIFC. This practice often results in Offerors facing dual regulatory requirements – those of the DIFC and those of the target market(s).
The DFSA's review was guided by its principles of using resources efficiently and ensuring the cost of regulation is proportionate to its benefits. The current framework is perceived as potentially imposing an undue regulatory burden due to the duplication of regulations, especially since local regulators in target jurisdictions are responsible for protecting investors within their territories.
A benchmarking exercise by the DFSA revealed that securities regulators in other prominent financial centres such as Singapore, Hong Kong, the ADGM, the EU, the UK, and the British Virgin Islands only regulate offers of securities made 'in' their respective jurisdictions. They rely on the regulatory frameworks of the target jurisdictions to govern offers made 'from' their financial centres into those external markets.
1. Offers of Securities to the Public 'from' the DIFC
The central proposal is the removal of Offers of Securities to the Public made 'from' the DIFC from the DFSA's regulatory perimeter. The DFSA’s rationale for this proposed change is summarised below:
In line with this primary proposal, the DFSA also proposes not to mandate specific disclaimers in its rules regarding its non-involvement in offers made 'from' the DIFC. Potential Offerors should note that the general prohibition against misconduct in the Regulatory Law would still apply to the Offeror. Therefore, care should be taken to ensure that offering materials used in target jurisdictions do not include information that could be construed as being misleading, deceptive, fraudulent or dishonest. Offerors should, therefore, consider whether to include appropriate disclaimers in offering materials to ensure compliance with this overarching obligation.
Several consequential changes would arise from this amendment, if made:
2. Disapplying non-DIFC Offers from the Financial Promotion Rules
The DFSA's General Module (GEN) contains rules relating to Financial Promotions. To prevent duplicative requirements, these rules do not currently apply to Offers of Securities ('in' or 'from' the DIFC) made in compliance with the Markets Law and related MKT Rules.
If Offers of Securities to the Public 'from' the DIFC are removed from the scope of the Markets Law and MKT Rules as proposed, the Financial Promotion Rules in GEN would, by default, become applicable to such offers.
To avoid this, the DFSA proposes to disapply the Financial Promotion Rules in GEN specifically in relation to Offers of Securities to the Public made 'from' the DIFC. This is consistent with the overarching proposal that such offers would no longer fall within the DFSA's regulatory perimeter.
CP166 invites comments from the public and industry stakeholders on these proposals. The deadline for submitting comments is 16 June 2025.
Publication
Navigating the Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) regime is not an easy task and can be costly and time consuming.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025