
Publication
Essential UK Pensions News
Essential UK Pensions News covers the key pensions developments each month.
We use cookies and other similar technology to collect data about you to allow us to deliver our online services, measure our website audience and improve your browsing experience. Full details on the cookies we use are set out in our Cookies policy. Please click OK to signify your consent to our use of cookies.
You can withdraw your consent by clicking “manage cookies” and following the instructions shown.
Newsflash
Global | Publication | October 14, 2015
The Labour Appeal Court has confirmed that even if an employee has consented after an enquiry to a demotion as an alternative to dismissal, the demotion may still be unfair.
A perception exists that when an employer and employee have agreed on the employee’s demotion, the CCMA does not have jurisdiction to hear an unfair labour practice dispute relating to the demotion.The recent judgment of Builders Warehouse (Pty) Ltd v CCMA & others (case number PA1/14) held that even an agreed demotion may potentially be unfair. An agreement on demotion therefore does not deprive the CCMA of jurisdiction.The court confirmed, however, that the employee’s consent to the demotion may well be the decisive factor in determining the fairness of the demotion. This did not preclude the CCMA from considering all the factors, such as the reason for the demotion, the degree of the demotion and whether the employee was consulted prior to the demotion. It remains to be seen whether the CCMA would be able to overturn the agreement or whether the only remedy would be compensation.
In light of this judgment, employers need to revisit the terms of agreed demotions and seek legal advice to ensure that the risk associated with agreed demotions is minimised.
Publication
Essential UK Pensions News covers the key pensions developments each month.
Publication
An enduring merger control trend is the authorities’ greater focus on parties’ internal documents, and the related risk of penalties and delays to reviews where parties fail to submit complete responses to RFIs or provide incomplete or misleading submissions.
Publication
An increasing challenge for M&A parties is identifying where their deals will be reviewed in a context where merger control authorities are finding new ways to take jurisdiction over transactions falling below traditional (usually turnover-based) notification thresholds
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events...
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023