
Publikation
Legalseas
Our shipping law insights provide legal and market commentary, addressing the key questions and topics of interest to our clients operating in the shipping industry, helping them to effectively manage risk.
Global | Publikation | August 2020
This year, Australia experienced horrific bushfires, described as the most “evident and deeply traumatic experience of the huge impacts of climate change” by Christiana Figueres, the former Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Also this year, the Paris Agreement, which Ms Figueres helped to deliver, invites governments to set and communicate their long-term 2050 goals, and shorter-term targets up to 2030 to decarbonise their economies.
Since the first edition of our publication in January 2017, all states and territories have been steadily progressing their own policies and taking significant actions to reduce emissions, support renewable energy development, and increase energy efficiency. In the absence of a long-term target adopted by the Federal Government, on 9 July 2020, Australia achieved a de facto national target of net-zero emissions by 2050 when the Northern Territory Government released its Climate Change Response.
The Federal Government’s current target under the Paris Agreement is to reduce emissions by 26-28 per cent on 2005 levels by 2030. This builds on Australia’s target set under previous international conventions to reduce emissions to 5 per cent below 2000 levels by 2020. Based on the Federal Government’s 2019 emissions projection report, and with the existing policies in place at a Federal level, Australia is not expected to be able to meet the 2030 target without the use of Kyoto units carried over from previous commitment periods under the Kyoto Protocol (the predecessor to the Paris Agreement).
This second edition of our climate policy update provides the readers with:
This edition was authored by Elisa de Wit, Jacqueline Plant, Luke Havemann, Sonali Seneviratne, Laura Waterford, Krista MacPherson, Nancy Zheng, Sasha Aronson, Huw Calford, Nancy Zheng, James Nunez, Madeleine Begg-Cotter, John Tullio and Nabil Abrahams.
Publikation
Our shipping law insights provide legal and market commentary, addressing the key questions and topics of interest to our clients operating in the shipping industry, helping them to effectively manage risk.
Blog
Cheat-Software ist für Spielehersteller seit Langem ein Ärgernis. Doch stellt sie auch eine Urheberrechtsverletzung dar? In einer wegweisenden Entscheidung vom 31. Juli 2025 hat der Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) entschieden, dass Cheat-Tools, die lediglich In-Game-Variablen im RAM manipulieren – ohne den Programmcode zu verändern – nicht gegen das Softwareurheberrecht nach EU-Recht verstoßen.
Blog
Cheat software has long been a thorn in the side of game publishers. But does it also constitute a copyright infringement? In a landmark decision, issued on 31 July 2025, the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ruled that cheat tools that merely manipulate in-game variables in RAM - without altering the program code - do not violate software copyright under EU law.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025