Publication
Supreme Court of Canada rejects narrow interpretation of disclosure standard for “material changes”
The Supreme Court of Canada has released its long-awaited decision on Lundin Mining Corp. v Markowich, dismissing the issuer’s appeal
Author:
Canada | Publication | June 28, 2024
Summer is underway in Quebec. Like every year, this season will be short and the cooler temperatures will be fast upon us. This year, fall means amendments to the Act respecting labour standards (the Act) come into force.
As of September 27, 2024, Quebec employers must ensure that their harassment prevention policies comply with the minimum content defined by the Act.
First of all, this policy will now be called the "policy to prevent and manage situations of psychological harassment." More than just a new title, it also includes new obligations for employers, including designating a duly trained person to handle complaints and reports, developing an inquiry process and implementing measures to ensure confidentiality.
Your policy must set out, in particular:
Note that these changes apply only to companies under provincial jurisdiction.
It is therefore in the interest of provincial jurisdiction companies to review their policies now, and update them as necessary to comply with the changes to the Act before they come into force on September 27. Moreover, the law provides for fines in the event of failure to adopt a compliant policy.
This summer, take some time to review your psychological harassment prevention policy!
Publication
The Supreme Court of Canada has released its long-awaited decision on Lundin Mining Corp. v Markowich, dismissing the issuer’s appeal
Publication
Bill C-15, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on November 4, 2025, has been introduced in the House of Commons and has completed its second reading.
Publication
In November 2025, the Ontario Court of Appeal released a decision quashing a summons issued by an investigator appointed by the Ontario Securities Commission, holding that the summons was unconstitutionally overbroad.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025