
Publication
How the new Building Canada Act works
On June 26, Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, received royal assent. The One Canadian Economy Act introduces two pieces of legislation aimed at bolstering economic development in Canada.
Author:
Canada | Publication | June 4, 2020
In Youyi Group Holdings v Brentwood Lanes, the British Columbia Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s decision to refuse to enforce two real estate purchase contracts on the basis that the contracts were “tainted” by the illegality of a larger fraudulent scheme.
Youyi Group Holdings (Canada) Ltd. and DHI Holdings Inc. (the purchasers) and Brentwood Lanes Canada Ltd. and Maple Ridge Lanes (1981) Ltd. (the vendors) entered into two linked agreements of purchase and sale (the purchase agreements) for two commercial properties.
The purchasers, with the assistance of their real estate agent, devised a scheme to deceive mortgage lenders, brokers, appraisers and potential joint venture partners into providing more financing than was warranted. The scheme comprised the following components:
Two weeks before closing, the vendors advised the purchasers they would not be proceeding with the sale due to the alleged wrongdoing of the purchasers and their common real estate agent. The purchasers commenced an action against the vendors for specific performance of the purchase agreements.
The trial judge concluded that the various agreements were interrelated and each an essential part of the overall transaction, which was intended to deceive third-party lenders. The trial judge declined to enforce the purchase agreements on the ground that they were tainted by the illegality of the overall scheme.
In dismissing the purchasers’ appeal, the court made the following key points respecting the defence of illegality in Canada:
The court held that by preparing separately numbered schedules that could be removed from lending applications, the purchasers had deliberately structured the transaction to facilitate fraud. It was therefore open to the trial judge to decline to enforce the purchase agreements.
The court left open the issue of whether the fraudulent schemes that were proposed as part of the transaction but not carried out (i.e., the false deposit scheme and the fabricated purchase agreement) could be considered as a basis to refuse to enforce the purchase agreements.
The court’s rejection of the rigid “reliance rule” is an acknowledgement that a principled, flexible approach is required to respond to the increasingly complex nature of fraud. It will be crucial to the illegality analysis to consider the context in which a document was created and its intended purpose within the larger fraudulent scheme.
Publication
On June 26, Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, received royal assent. The One Canadian Economy Act introduces two pieces of legislation aimed at bolstering economic development in Canada.
Publication
Canada and the European Union signed a Security and Defence Partnership (SDP), which formalizes a mutual intent to foster closer ties by establishing a framework for dialogue and cooperation across the full security and defence spectrum.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025