
Publication
Navigating international trade and tariffs
Impacts of evolving trade regulations and compliance risks
Canada | Publication | April 4, 2025
Costs awards in trademark opposition proceedings have been long anticipated in Canada. On April 1, 2025, the Registrar of Trademarks issued a practice notice detailing the procedures and criteria for awarding costs in trademark proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, and 45 of the Trademarks Act.
Costs are intended to be awarded only in exceptional cases. The practice notice outlines the following circumstances:
However, unreasonable conduct is a broad category and includes pursuing a ground of opposition that has no reasonable chance of success.
Cost consequences are tied to a request for a hearing. A party may request costs within 14 days after a hearing ends or is cancelled, or within 14 days after the end of the period for filing a request for a hearing, if none is requested. If the opposition or application is withdrawn prior to a hearing request, the Registrar does not have authority to order costs.
The amount of any costs award will be based on the prescribed fees for initiating the proceeding (current fees for initiating opposition proceedings in Canada are $1,085). The Registrar will provide reasons for the decision on costs in the final disposition of the proceeding. A certified copy of an order for costs may be filed in the Federal Court and enforced as an order of that court.
It remains to be seen whether potential cost consequences will affect trademark oppositions in Canada. Compared to the cost of opposition proceedings, the potential costs award is low, and the circumstances in which a costs award will be granted are limited. While potential costs award might deter some parties, and may check some unreasonable conduct, most cases will not likely be subject to a costs award. Even though costs may not always be awarded, the possibility may encourage parties to request them.
Publication
Impacts of evolving trade regulations and compliance risks
Publication
As discussed in our previous look at the 2025 proxy season, the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has elevated AI to a core governance concern for shareholders, and as AI continues to dominate headlines, the urgency of finding a balance between transparency, responsibility, and return on investment for shareholders is likely to spur a growing number of AI-related shareholder proposals in the coming years.
Publication
As Canadian businesses deal with tariff uncertainty and trade protectionism, the federal government has announced its intention to introduce rules promoting domestic goods and services in government contracting by most federal departments and agencies.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2025