Publication
La Cour suprême du Canada tranche : les cadres ne pourront se syndiquer au Québec
Le 19 avril dernier, la Cour suprême du Canada a rendu une décision fort attendue en matière de syndicalisation des cadres.
Mondial | Publication | November 8, 2016
Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”) has released its proposed voting policies for the 2017 proxy season for US and non-US companies listed in the US. The proposed US policies relate to: (1) unilateral board actions at companies with multi-class capital structures at their initial public offerings (“IPO”s), (2) restrictions on binding shareholder proposals, (3) general share issuance mandates for US-listed, foreign incorporated companies (“cross-market companies”), and (4) executive pay assessments for cross-market companies. The full texts of the proposed policies are available here. Comments to the proposed policies are due by 6 p.m. ET on November 10. The final 2017 policies are expected to be released in the week of November 14 and would be effective for shareholder meetings held on or after February 1, 2017.
In 2015, ISS amended its policies to establish a separate methodology for evaluating unilateral board actions to adopt bylaw or charter amendments prior to or in connection with a company’s IPO from methodology for evaluating unilateral board actions after completion of an IPO. Currently, however, ISS policy does not explicitly address director accountability with respect to a company’s capital structure in place at the time of an IPO. Recognizing that the number of companies completing IPOs with multi-class structures is increasing, ISS proposes to amend its policy for IPO-companies for the 2017 proxy season.
Under the updated policies, ISS would issue negative recommendations for director nominees at companies that have completed an IPO with a multi-class capital structure in which the classes have unequal voting rights, unless there is a “reasonable” sunset provision on the multi-class capital structure. Contrary to current policy, ISS would no longer consider a company’s commitment to put the provision to a shareholder vote when issuing vote recommendations.
ISS requests comments on the following issues:
While shareholders’ ability to amend the bylaws is considered a fundamental right, some state laws allow companies to restrict this right in their charters. In addressing this problem, ISS proposes a vote against or withold from members of the governance committee if the company’s charter or articles of incorporation imposes “undue restrictions” on shareholders’ ability to amend the bylaws. Undue restrictions include, among others, (1) an outright prohibition on the submission of binding shareholder proposals and (2) share ownership requirements or holding period requirements in excess of Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 14a-8 requirements. ISS would issue the negative recommendation on an ongoing basis.
ISS requests comments on the following issues:
Some cross-market companies (US-listed, foreign incorporated companies) are required by rules of their countries of incorporation to seek approval for any share issuance. To avoid having special meeting every time new shares are issued, these companies often seek annual approval for a general mandate for share issuance (i.e., those without a specific purpose). Currently, approval for general mandates is evaluated under the policy of the country of incorporation. However, these policies are often driven by local listing rules and best practices which do not generally apply to companies without a listing in that market. In contrast, US-listed companies are subject to New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) or Nasdaq rules on share issuances, which are not reflected in ISS’ non-US policies.
Under new policies, ISS would recommend in favor of general share issuance authorities up to a maximum of 20% of currently issued capital, as long as the duration of the authority is clearly disclosed and reasonable. The proposed policy is intended to better reflect US listing rules and the expectations of investors in the US market.
ISS requests comments on the following issues:
Due to differing home country and US requirements, certain cross-market companies are required to put multiple compensation proposals on the same ballot relating to a single pay program. Currently, items that are on the ballot due solely to the requirements of another market (listing, incorporation or national code) may be evaluated under the policy of the relevant market, regardless of the “assigned” market coverage. However, a growing number of investors and non-investors have expressed a preference for aligning vote policies and recommendations for multiple proposals on the same compensation program.
Recognizing this, ISS proposes that the new policy apply only to those cross-market companies that are US domestic issuers (foreign incorporated companies that have a majority of shareholders in the US, meet other criteria as determined by the SEC, and are subject to the same disclosure and listing standards as US-incorporated companies). Those US domestic issuers with multiple compensation proposals on the ballot that pertain to the same pay program would be assessed on a case-by-case basis using the following principles: (1) align voting recommendations to avoid inconsistent recommendations on the same pay program, and (2) use the policy perspective of the country in which the company is listed (e.g., US say-on-pay policy for all proposals relating to executive pay). If there is no applicable US policy, then the policy of the country that requires the proposal to be on ballot would apply.
ISS seeks feedback on the following issue:
*Jennifer Huh, a law clerk, assisted in the preparation of this article.
Publication
Le 19 avril dernier, la Cour suprême du Canada a rendu une décision fort attendue en matière de syndicalisation des cadres.
Publication
Le budget 2024 propose d’élargir la portée de certains pouvoirs permettant à l’ARC de demander des renseignements aux contribuables tout en prévoyant de nouvelles conséquences pour les contribuables contrevenants.
Publication
L'impôt minimum de remplacement (IMR) est un impôt sur le revenu additionnel prévu dans la Loi de l’impôt sur le revenu (Canada) (la « Loi ») auquel sont assujettis les particuliers et certaines fiducies qui pourraient autrement avoir recours à certaines déductions et exemptions et à certains crédits pour réduire leur impôt sur le revenu fédéral canadien régulier.
Abonnez-vous et restez à l’affût des nouvelles juridiques, informations et événements les plus récents...
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023