AI Inventorship on the horizon: Part 3
December 14, 2021
In Part 1 of this blog post series, we looked at DABUS, an artificial intelligence machine, and the treatment of AI-conceived inventions by various patent offices. In Part 2, we considered an Australian Federal Court judgement that accepted that an AI could be an inventor, and compared it with decisions (and related court appeals) reached by the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, the European Patent Office, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, which found that AI could not be named the inventor on a patent.